Skip to navigationSkip to content
Campaign buttons for Democratic presidential candidate and billionaire Michael Bloomberg.
REUTERS/Caitlin Ochs
Campaign buttons for Democratic presidential candidate and billionaire Michael Bloomberg.
QZ ESSAY

Bloomberg is playing by the rules. And that’s the problem

Pete Gelling
By Pete Gelling

Geopolitics editor

Michael Bloomberg, the wily billionaire hoping to dethrone Donald Trump as US president, took a beating this week while making his first appearance in a Democratic Party primary debate.

It might not matter. Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren, who absolutely throttled the former New York mayor onstage, noted afterwards that Bloomberg’s poor showing was unlikely to derail his campaign in the long term.

“I’ll bet he’s reaching in his pocket and spending $100 million more on advertising to try and erase everyone’s memory of what happened last night,” Warren said the following morning.

To her point, Bloomberg’s well-paid staff of video editors managed to quickly spin a version of the debate that made it look like he did alright. It was so surprising given the reality of his performance that rumors quickly spread online that the video was a so-called “deep fake.” It wasn’t. It was just the kind of modern spin that one of the world’s richest men (ninth richest, to be exact) can easily afford.

American elections are unusual in that the US government imposes few limits on outside contributions to campaigns, and no limits on campaign spending. And while the freedom a candidate has to use their own funds is denied or highly regulated in most democracies, in the US it is not.

This presents a problem. A wealthy candidate can afford more TV, print, and online advertising—not to mention a better staff—than a rival who depends mostly on outside contributions. In the case of a billionaire like Bloomberg, whose net worth exceeds $60 billion, the problem becomes stratospheric.

Bloomberg joined the race in November—a late start. By the end of January, he had spent over $400 million, more than the top four frontrunners combined. Vermont senator Bernie Sanders had spent close to $120 million, Warren a little over $90 million. Both of them rely almost entirely on small, individual donations.

Former South Bend, Indiana mayor Pete Buttigieg has fared surprisingly well so far. Yet his campaign is close to going broke. In a recent fundraising plea, he noted the following: “We are now also up against a billionaire who is throwing colossal sums of money on television instead of doing the work of campaigning.” It’s hard to compete against that.

It might seem unfair. But Bloomberg is playing by the rules. And that is the real problem.

A version of this essay was originally published in the weekend edition of the Quartz Daily Brief newsletter. Sign up for it here.

Subscribe to the Daily Brief, our morning email with news and insights you need to understand our changing world.