Skip to navigationSkip to content
BETWEEN THE LINES

An easy way to measure the gulf between the UK and EU’s trade negotiating positions

Participants hold a British Union flag and an EU flag during a pro-EU referendum event at Parliament Square in London, Britain June 19, 2016.
REUTERS/Neil Hall/File Photo
“Partnership” vs “independence.”
Adam Rasmi
By Adam Rasmi

Reporter

The UK today published its negotiating mandate for trade talks with the EU (the bloc published its own mandate earlier this week). Judging by the substance of each document—and the specific words within them—it won’t be easy for the two sides to bridge their differences and secure a free trade agreement before the Brexit transition period ends on Dec. 31. 

The UK’s mandate uses the word “agreement” 240 times, more than four times as often as the EU. By contrast, the bloc mentions “partnership” 209 times, a word that is virtually absent from Britain’s text. These discrepancies highlight the fundamental gulf between the two sides: The UK appears to be seeking an arms-length future relationship rather than the close partnership the EU would prefer.

While Europe might want a “level playing field” (mentioned 13 times) to avoid a major economic competitor on its doorstep, Britain’s government has pushed back against regulatory alignment. The UK also talks more about trade (110 references to the EU’s 50) and independence (10 to 0). These are simply the latest signs the UK wants more of a pared-back Canada-style trade deal, or as chief negotiator David Frost put it last week: “to set laws that suit us—to claim the right that every other non-EU country in the world has.”

Unfortunately for the UK, the EU has more leverage as the far bigger economic power. Which means the UK might have to concede a lot more in negotiations, unless it decides to walk away from a deal.

Such a prospect was floated in today’s mandate. If the “broad outline” of an agreement is not reached by June, the government “will need to decide whether the UK’s attention should move away from negotiations and focus solely on continuing domestic preparations to exit the transition period in an orderly fashion.”

It would perhaps be unwise for the EU to see the UK’s position as a bluff. Prime minister Boris Johnson has frequently defied expectations, whether that’s drumming up support for Brexit ahead of the 2016 referendum or scoring a decisive election victory this past December. After all, he has a recent track record of winning, and winning convincingly.

📬 Kick off each morning with coffee and the Daily Brief (BYO coffee).

By providing your email, you agree to the Quartz Privacy Policy.