Skip to navigationSkip to content

What Spotify’s CEO was really telling employees in his memo about Joe Rogan

Daniel Ek speaking on a stage
REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/File Photo
Daniel Ek wrote to employees to defend the company’s decisions about Joe Rogan.
Published Last updated

On Feb. 7, Spotify co-founder and CEO Daniel Ek wrote to his employees to explain how he views the evolving controversy involving its star podcaster Joe Rogan.

Artists including Neil Young and Joni Mitchell have pulled their music off of Spotify in protest against Rogan’s pushing of misinformation about the covid-19 vaccines. Then came the discovery of the former Fear Factor host’s frequent use of the n-word on his podcast. Ek, in a memo to staff, acknowledged employees’ concerns but doubled down on his support for The Joe Rogan Experience.

Ek’s letter is a classic non-apology, admitting no wrongdoing or carelessness. He urges employees to think about open debate, free speech, and the principle of elevating controversial voices.

What Ek fails to grasp, it seems, is that when you pay a podcaster $100 million to publish exclusively on your platform, you become somewhat responsible for what he says.

We’ve annotated Ek’s memo to Spotify employees

The full text of the memo is below.

Click each footnote for our helpful translation.

Spotify Team,

There are no words I can say to adequately convey how deeply sorry I am for the way The Joe Rogan Experience controversy continues to impact each of you. 1

Not only are some of Joe Rogan’s comments incredibly hurtful — I want to make clear that they do not represent the values of this company. I know this situation leaves many of you feeling drained, frustrated and unheard. 2

I think it’s important you’re aware that we’ve had conversations with Joe and his team about some of the content in his show, including his history of using some racially insensitive language. Following these discussions and his own reflections, he chose to remove a number of episodes from Spotify. He also issued his own apology over the weekend. 3

While I strongly condemn what Joe has said and I agree with his decision to remove past episodes from our platform, I realize some will want more. And I want to make one point very clear — I do not believe that silencing Joe is the answer. We should have clear lines around content and take action when they are crossed, but canceling voices is a slippery slope. Looking at the issue more broadly, it’s critical thinking and open debate that powers real and necessary progress. 4

Another criticism that I continue to hear from many of you is that it’s not just about The Joe Rogan Experience on Spotify; it comes down to our direct relationship with him. In last week’s Town Hall, I outlined to you that we are not the publisher of JRE. But perception due to our exclusive license implies otherwise. So I’ve been wrestling with how this perception squares with our values. 5

If we believe in having an open platform as a core value of the company, then we must also believe in elevating all types of creators, including those from underrepresented communities and a diversity of backgrounds. We’ve been doing a great deal of work in this area already but I think we can do even more. So I am committing to an incremental investment of $100 million for the licensing, development, and marketing of music (artists and songwriters) and audio content from historically marginalized groups. This will dramatically increase our efforts in these areas. 6

While some might want us to pursue a different path, I believe that more speech on more issues can be highly effective in improving the status quo and enhancing the conversation altogether. 7

I deeply regret that you are carrying so much of this burden. I also want to be transparent in setting the expectation that in order to achieve our goal of becoming the global audio platform, these kinds of disputes will be inevitable. For me, I come back to centering on our mission of unlocking the potential of human creativity and enabling more than a billion people to enjoy the work of what we think will be more than 50 million creators. That mission makes these clashes worth the effort. 8

I’ve told you several times over the last week, but I think it’s critical we listen carefully to one another and consider how we can and should do better. I’ve spent this time having lots of conversations with people inside and outside of Spotify — some have been supportive while others have been incredibly hard, but all of them have made me think. 9

One of the things I am thinking about is what additional steps we can take to further balance creator expression with user safety. I’ve asked our teams to expand the number of outside experts we consult with on these efforts and look forward to sharing more details. 10

Your passion for this company and our mission has made a difference in the lives of so many listeners and creators around the world. I hope you won’t lose sight of that. It’s that ability to focus and improve Spotify even on some of our toughest days that has helped us build the platform we have. We have a clear opportunity to learn and grow together from this challenge and I am ready to meet it head on. 11

I know it is difficult to have these conversations play out so publicly, and I continue to encourage you to reach out to your leaders, your HR partners or me directly if you need support or resources for yourself or your team.


Spotify has more to lose than the music of Neil Young and Joni Mitchell

Ek’s support for The Joe Rogan Experience continues despite the existence of 110 episodes featuring content that potentially broke Spotify’s own content policies. According to the website JRE Missing, which tracks the take-downs, the removed episodes featured guests like conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes, former Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos, alt-right activist Charles C. Johnson, and the white supremacist Stefan Molyneux.

Rogan apologized for using the n-word in years past and said he agrees that “there’s no context where a white person is ever allowed to say that, never mind publicly on a podcast.” Ek, meanwhile, makes clear that the removal of the episodes was a choice by Rogan, and not by Spotify, which wants to avoid a “slippery slope” toward who knows what.

If Ek thinks Rogan and his podcast are acceptable, and anything goes on Spotify, then maybe he should just say so plainly. Employees, investors, artists, and other podcasters would be better suited to decide whether they want to stay or go.

📬 Kick off each morning with coffee and the Daily Brief (BYO coffee).

By providing your email, you agree to the Quartz Privacy Policy.