On the outskirts of downtown St. Paul, Minnesota, Xcel Energy’s High Bridge Generating Station offers an iconic view of the current state of electrical generation in the United States. Opened in 2008 as a replacement for an aging coal plant, the 534-megawatt natural gas facility looms over three solar photovoltaic panels that provide a sculptural element to the site in addition to 9.8 kilowatts of electricity.
In the United States in 2014, PV accounted for around half of a percent of the nation’s electricity production compared with natural gas’s 27%, according to the US Energy Information Administration. Yet if PV seems more ornamental than a serious energy contender, the data over the past two years documenting a dramatic increase in PV generation show a promising rookie ready to compete in the big leagues.
Both natural gas and PV have compelling attributes in an age where concerns over global climate change have led to mounting public and political pressure to reduce carbon emissions. PV is virtually carbon free and for all practical purposes has an endless energy generator in the sun. However, it’s intermittent, while natural gas provides constant baseline energy at nearly half the level of carbon dioxide emissions as coal.
Both natural gas prices and PV costs have plunged in recent years. Some utility-scale PV projects in the West have power generation comparable to natural gas plants—in the hundreds of megawatts—and were built at costs competitive with other energy sources. At the same time, natural gas production is growing fast due to hydraulic fracturing and plummeting costs.
All this leads to a big question: As natural gas grows, will it clip solar’s success—or can the two be collaborators in creating a less carbon-intense energy system?
Let’s start with the facts. The EIA points to a more than 100% increase in PV generation from 2013 to 2014, by far the highest growth rate of any generation source, well beyond natural gas or wind. Using Federal Energy Regulatory Commission data, a recent report at Renewable Energy World revealed that renewables slightly beat out natural gas in new generation for 2014 (at 49.81% compared with 48.65%). PV and solar thermal alone accounted for 20.4%.
In the first three quarters of last year a PV project was installed every three minutes in the United States, the Solar Energy Industries Association reported, and projections show that America’s 20 gigawatts of solar will double in just the next two years. Earlier this year Apple announced an investment in an $850 million First Solar farm that will power its California operations, joining other corporations such as Walmart and Starwood Hotels and Resorts in using the sun as an energy source. “We know at Apple that climate change is real,” Apple CEO Tim Cook said at an investors’ conference. “The time for talk is past. The time for action is now.”
Four factors have propelled PV’s dramatic rise. Stefan Reichelstein, professor at the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University, points to federal tax credits of 30% for solar installations, state renewable portfolio standards—RPSs—requiring utilities to invest in renewable energy, pro-solar policies and the plunging cost of panels.
“How did solar manage to get that much growth going over the last couple of years? The regulations and public policy are a large part of it,” he says. “They have really driven the growth.”
The “investment tax credit” of 30% on residential and commercial projects has helped create more than 100,000 jobs in the solar industry, according to Tom Kimbis, vice president of executive affairs for SEIA. “The trajectory of growth has surpassed the predictions even of the policy makers who created it,” he says. “In solar we have made a public investment, just as we have with coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear and hydro. And with that investment we’ve seen a phenomenal return.”
California is a good example, with a renewable portfolio standard calling for 33% of all retail electric sales to come from renewable energy by 2020. With one of the country’s best solar resources, the Golden State added 1,700 megawatts of PV in 2014 out of total of 2,500 MW of new renewable generation, including the largest PV installation in the world. The state’s Go Solar program and large utility-scale projects have led to its number one ranking for solar energy production in the country. Twenty-nine states have renewable portfolio standards, too, helping fuel the growth of PV. SEIA’s list of the top solar states for installed capacity includes North Carolina, Texas, Arizona and Missouri.
Paralleling PV’s increase in popularity has been a dramatic rise in the availability and use of natural gas to generate electricity. Natural gas’s boom derives from the hydraulic fracturing—fracking—revolution that began in an experimental phase in the 1970s and 1980s as a result of federal government-sponsored research at a time when the industry had been in a slow decline, according to the environmental think tank The Breakthrough Institute. Hydraulic fracturing uses a mixture of water, sand and chemicals to drill through limestone and shale to recover natural gas.
After two decades of experiments Mitchell Energy, which had worked extensively with government agencies, developed an innovative, inexpensive drilling technology widely credited with jump-starting the shale fossil fuel revolution. Today about one-third of all natural gas comes from shale.
“It’s been quite a spectacular shift” from coal to gas due to increasing supplies and dropping prices, says Frank Brock, senior energy market specialist for the advisory firm ICF International. “We’re in a gas surplus environment because of the shale in the Marcellus Region. It’s really quite incredible, and that’s happened in just a few years.”
FERC reports 59% gas plant expansions and new facilities in 2014 added 7,485 MW to the grid nationally. The year before, even more plants and roughly the same amount of power was added. While it’s true that PV installation rate grew faster than the natural gas installation rate over the past two years, the aggregate amount of electric generation from the sun is still smaller than natural gas and wind, so new natural gas production added more power than any other energy source.
A sense of synergy
So, returning to our original question, what does this rise in natural gas mean for the future of solar power in the US?
Solar advocates see natural gas as less a competitor and more of a complementary energy source. “Natural gas and solar are to me the two sources of power that many in the energy sector are looking at as the biggest players moving forward—at least for the foreseeable future,” says Kimbis. “Great synergy” exists in deploying PV as an intermittent power source supplement to natural gas’s status as a baseline power source that runs 24/7, he says, pointing to a Florida power plant that deploys both to optimize power production. “We’re not in a position to attack natural gas, because it’s a really nice fit with solar,” he says.
The PV market is really three separate markets with different engines driving their growth: rooftop, community solar and utility-scale solar. Utility-scale PV projects—mainly being constructed in the Southwest states and California—will be affected most by natural gas prices, according to Steve Fine, vice president for ICF International.
“They compete with natural gas because they sell into the wholesale market, but they are subsidized by the underlying RPS policy in return for a green premium, a renewable energy credit,” he says. “If natural gas prices continue to be low, that means that ratepayers will be paying more for energy from solar.”
Predicting how a diminished RPS will impact rooftop solar and community solar is difficult. Many homeowners deploy PV to take advantage not only of the sun but of tax credits. The dropping price of panels from $7 a watt to a likely $2.30 this year makes PV “within striking distance, in economic terms, of new construction for traditional power-generation technologies, such as coal, natural gas and nuclear energy,” according to McKinsey & Company. As for community solar, early results in Minnesota show an appetite among larger companies and institutions, which like the hedge the 20-year contracts provide.
Complicating the picture is the fact that natural gas and PV each has its own set of challenges that could thwart future growth.
Among those for natural gas are continued environmental concerns over hydraulic fracturing and the cost of groundwater contamination, the use of chemicals and the leakage of pollutants during extraction. The transport of natural gas through pipelines and trucks create fears of environmental degradation. The environmental community is marshaling an effort against hydraulic fracturing while some financial analysts point to a natural gas glut that could create a financial meltdown.
Solar PV faces its own issues. One clearly is the 30% solar investment tax credit, which Congress will likely debate before the credit lapses at the end of 2016. As the wind industry has discovered, there is no guarantee of renewing tax credits. The wind industry uses a “production tax credit” it shares with geothermal and bioenergy. Congress put off passing the PTC in 2014, finally doing so in two weeks before the end of the year. The one-year extension applied retroactively only to projects started in 2014.
Enacted in 1992, the PTC has been allowed by Congress to expire six times. The Union of Concerned Scientists reported wind installations in years after those expirations dropped between 76 and 93%. Extending it this year looks daunting. Could solar run into the same problem?
The price of PV would rise if the tax credit goes away. “That may put a damper on solar,” says Reichelstein. “Its cost curve would have to come down again in the future before it closes in on natural gas.”
But the natural gas industry over the decades has enjoyed its own hefty set of subsidies, according to a 2011 report prepared for the Nuclear Energy Institute by Management Information Services, Inc. From 1950 to 2010 natural gas companies received $121 billion in subsidies, the majority ($106 billion) coming through tax policies. The report pointed to depletion allowances for drilling and development costs as well as the alternative fuel production credit as the primary subsidies for natural gas.
At any rate, clearly more than cost should factor in. As Reichelstein points out, natural gas “is costly and has environmental consequences,” from the drilling process to emissions from burning, whereas solar “is abundant and free.”
Indeed, while few experts expect solar electric generation to overtake natural gas anytime soon, the idea of its ascendance seems agreeable as the US government moves to reduce carbon emissions and the market moves to reduce risk. The most recent EIA forecast suggests natural gas overtaking coal in electricity generation by 2040, though faster retirement of coal plants could make that happen as soon as 2019. By 2040 renewable energy, including PV, will generate 16% of the nation’s electric needs, the EIA predicts.
For a less carbon-rich future that’s not necessarily a bad outcome. As the main component of a platform for creating a less polluting power generation system, natural gas looks less like a competitor and more like a good companion to PV and other forms of renewable energy.
This post originally appeared at Ensia.