Skip to navigationSkip to content
KEEPING IT REAL

The Nobel prize in economics was awarded for showing the world as it is—not how it should be

A picture of British economist Angus Deaton, winner of the 2015 economics Nobel Prize, is seen on a screen as Goran K. Hansson (C), permanent secretary for the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, and Tore Ellingsen (L), chairman of the prize committee, and Jakob Svensson, member of the Academy, address a news conference at the Royal Swedish Academy of Science, in Stockholm, Sweden October 12, 2015. Deaton won the 2015 economics Nobel Prize for "his analysis of consumption, poverty, and we
Reuters/Maja Suslin
Stockholm calling.
  • Jenny Anderson
By Jenny Anderson

Senior reporter, Editor of How to be Human

This article is more than 2 years old.

The Nobel prize in economics* has been awarded to Angus Deaton, British-born professor of economics and international affairs at Princeton University. The 69-year-old received the award for his research on measuring and understanding consumption, poverty, and welfare, especially in developing countries.

Deaton strives to understand the world as it is, not how economic models suggest it should be. Consumers do not behave the same way in rich and poor countries, and poverty takes on radically different characteristics from country to country.

“When you read that world poverty has fallen below 10% for the first time ever and you want to know how we know—the answer is Deaton’s work on household surveys, data collection and welfare measurement,” writes Alex Tabarrok at Marginal revolution. “I see Deaton’s major contribution as understanding and measuring world poverty.”

Among his wide-ranging research output, Deaton shows that children consume about 30-40% of what adults consume, suggesting per-capita estimates of poverty are overstated in families with children. He also digs into data and surveys to challenge the conventional wisdom that happiness increases with age—that is mainly the case only in rich, English-speaking countries. India is an obsession of his, and in a particularly interesting paper (PDF) he examines the puzzle that Indians’ average calorie intake has fallen as they have grown richer.

Taken together, Deaton’s work addresses the shortcoming in measurement tools, challenging fundamental assumptions about common economic indicators. He lamented many economists’ bad habits in an essay last year (pdf):

Academic economists spend a lot less time with the creators and producers of data than once was the case, to the detriment of both groups; economists often do not understand the data they work with, and the evolution of national income accounting practice has taken place without much input from academic users. Yet much of what we think we know about the world is dependent on data that may not mean what we think they mean or that are contradicted by other data to which, for no very well developed reason except habit, we give less weight.

Deaton’s prize follows others awarded to researchers who challenge the basic tenets of economics. In 2002, psychologist Daniel Kahneman won the award (with Vernon L. Smith) for recognizing that human beings do not, in fact, always make rational decisions or behave in uniform ways. According to the Nobel committee, ”Deaton’s focus on household surveys has helped transform development economics from a theoretical field based on aggregate data to an empirical field based on detailed individual data.”

In other words, Deaton has helped make development economics more real.

*Alfred Nobel did not include economics when he set up awards in in physics, chemistry, literature, medicine and peace in 1895. The Swedish central bank established the award in 1968 with the title of the Sveriges Riskbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.

📬 Kick off each morning with coffee and the Daily Brief (BYO coffee).

By providing your email, you agree to the Quartz Privacy Policy.