Skip to navigationSkip to content

San Francisco voters rejected a measure limiting Airbnb rentals

In this photo taken Thursday, Oct. 29, 2015, are election signs in a Chinatown window supporting affordable housing in the Mission District and restrictions on short term rentals in San Francisco. San Francisco voters will decide Tuesday whether to restrict Airbnb operations in the city, impose a freeze on luxury housing in the Mission and approve a $310 million bond for affordable housing. They will also vote on whether to retain Mayor Ed Lee, probably yes as he faces no real competition, but could boot out the sheriff. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg)
AP Photo/Eric Risberg
The city's all riled up over Prop F.
By Alice Truong

Deputy editor

Published This article is more than 2 years old.

In a major victory for Airbnb, San Francisco voters have rejected by a wide margin a measure limiting short-term rentals in the city to 75 nights a year, according to early voting results.

Residents decided on 11 ballot initiatives this year, but perhaps none has been more closely watched by the tech industry—or as contentious—as Proposition F, also known as the “Airbnb initiative.” Just yesterday, housing activists in favor of “Prop. F” stormed Airbnb’s headquarters in the rapidly gentrifying South of Market district, occupying its lobby for about an hour and a half.

With more than 65,000 mail-in votes counted on Tuesday night in San Francisco, the measure was losing big: 61% against to 39% in favor.

Airbnb has spent more than $8 million campaigning against the measure, including running a series of tone-deaf ads that it subsequently apologized for and pulled. In addition to the 75-night cap, Proposition F would have required hosts to file quarterly reports with the city’s planning department, and relied on neighbors to ensure residents were complying with the limits.

The company has insisted that further restrictions to its service would only hurt the middle class, who rely on supplemental income from renting their homes to stay in the city. Last year, San Francisco passed a ballot initiative requiring hosts to obtain permits with the city and rent out their homes for no more than 90 nights a year. But enforcement has been difficult, with only a fraction of hosts registering and Airbnb refusing to hand over booking information.

Activists argue that Airbnb is displacing residents by removing available units from the housing market, further exacerbating the city’s housing crisis—where 63% of homes are valued at $1 million or more and median rents recently crept past $4,000. A report from the city’s budget analyst released in May found up to 2,000 units in San Francisco were not permanently occupied so they could be rented out to tourists.

📬 Kick off each morning with coffee and the Daily Brief (BYO coffee).

By providing your email, you agree to the Quartz Privacy Policy.