Good afternoon.
Nancy Pelosi says the House will draft articles of impeachment against Donald Trump. The Associated Press reports that the House speaker made the announcement at a news conference, before which Trump tweeted that Democrats have no case, but if they're going to impeach him, they should "do it now."
OPEC wants to further cut oil supply. At its meeting in Vienna, the cartel will be looking to hammer out an agreement with non-OPEC producers, though Russia isn’t yet on board with the plan, Reuters reports.
Huawei plans to sue the US government. The Chinese giant is taking legal action against a recent decision by the Federal Communications Commission to prevent US carriers from using federal subsidies to purchase Huawei equipment, NBC reports. It’s the latest in a string of lawsuits filed by the company around the world.
SpaceX takes off
SpaceX launches a mission to the International Space Station. The Dragon spacecraft is carrying more than two tons of supplies and research cargo, and it'll try again Thursday after winds made launching a bad idea on the original Dec. 4 date. A NASA official declined to confirm if any holiday surprises for the astronauts are onboard.
Uber everywhere
Redrawing the map
The impeachment hearings
Impeachment witnesses split down party lines. The New York Times writes that three out of four legal scholars (those invited by Democrats) agreed that Donald Trump’s dealings with Ukraine are impeachable. The other (a Republican invitee) said the case against him isn’t solid.
Republicans abandon constitutional originalism. Conservatives lean on the philosophy of wondering what the framers of the US Constitution would think, as a judicial defense. Yet, they let go of all of that in the ongoing impeachment inquiry.
A "dishonest scrivener" covertly changed the Constitution’s impeachment clause. A Constitutional scholar at the inquiry hearing today mentioned the day in 1787 when the Constitutional convention debated a clause on impeaching.
If you are a style freak then you already know just how strongly word nerds feel about the importance of phrasing things just so. But what you may not know is that the framers of the US Constitution created a style committee to arrange the final document, and one of the word nerds on it was a dishonest
If you are a style freak then you already know just how strongly word nerds feel about the importance of phrasing things just so. But what you may not know is that the framers of the US Constitution created a style committee to arrange the final document, and one of the word nerds on it was a dishonest scrivener who advanced his own constitutional approach through subtle but substantive changes that were ratified and became part of the text of this founding legal document.
It is an interesting history, and the full 100-page study of the question may contain information about serious changes, but the following facts seem to matter most: 1) The Convention approved the Constitution, 2) the States ratified the Constitution, 3) any crime committed by a President is by the nature
It is an interesting history, and the full 100-page study of the question may contain information about serious changes, but the following facts seem to matter most: 1) The Convention approved the Constitution, 2) the States ratified the Constitution, 3) any crime committed by a President is by the nature of the office a betrayal of the trust of the People of the United States, and 4) while justices may wish to read the Convention proceedings or the Federalist Papers, the Constitution is the law. Finally, in the case of Donald J. Trump, evidence of various crimes already in the public domain shows him to have violated Articles I and II of the Constitution itself, so the question is moot.
And it’s good to see the Supreme Court justices take into consideration the intentions of the framers by considering the drafts and constitutional convention documents in their ruling.
What makes the US constitution strong is the fact that it accounts for human imperfections and temptations of power
And it’s good to see the Supreme Court justices take into consideration the intentions of the framers by considering the drafts and constitutional convention documents in their ruling.
What makes the US constitution strong is the fact that it accounts for human imperfections and temptations of power. While there may have been “philosopher kings”, there were no such things as “benevolent tyrants”.
The start of an epidemic
Obscure state regulations gave birth to the opioid crisis. Five states—California, Idaho, Illinois, New York, and Texas—were subject to a "triple threat" of conditions that left them particularly susceptible to a flood of painkillers.
Economists use different kinds of experiments to test theories, and a particularly effective type is a "natural experiment," where otherwise similar companies or countries might use different strategies or policies. That's what happened with US states at the birth of the opioid crisis, when some states
Economists use different kinds of experiments to test theories, and a particularly effective type is a "natural experiment," where otherwise similar companies or countries might use different strategies or policies. That's what happened with US states at the birth of the opioid crisis, when some states made it harder for doctors to prescribe drugs like oxycontin, while others had no such barriers. According to a new paper, Purdue Pharma understood the difference, and eagerly exploited it.
Political messaging
Hashtags like #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter make people doubt the news. When news outlets include viral hashtags in their social media posts, readers perceive the news topic to be less important, with some sensing political bias.
An anti-Bloomberg ad ran on bloomberg.com. The “[Michael] Bloomberg will take your guns ad” that slipped through an algorithmic decision-making process was the creation of US gun lobby NRA, which is unhappy with Bloomberg’s presidential bid.
I was astounded to see this ad and became even more surprised when reps from both Bloomberg.com and Taboola told me they each have policies against running any political ads. And yet they both failed in the most embarrassing way: Mike Bloomberg's fiercest political rival was able to use the candidate's
I was astounded to see this ad and became even more surprised when reps from both Bloomberg.com and Taboola told me they each have policies against running any political ads. And yet they both failed in the most embarrassing way: Mike Bloomberg's fiercest political rival was able to use the candidate's own news website to attack him over one of the issues he fights for the hardest.
The next big thing
Focus on the future
Disrupting dementia
Science can’t fix dementia’s most heartbreaking problem. No matter how far science advances, it will never be able to tell you how to personally deal with a dementia diagnosis. ✦
As a science journalist, I believe there's always an answer for how to do things. That's why reporting this story was so hard: I learned there IS no guidebook for taking care of a person with dementia. It's scary and lonely and heartbreaking.
I cried while interviewing my parents for this story, and
As a science journalist, I believe there's always an answer for how to do things. That's why reporting this story was so hard: I learned there IS no guidebook for taking care of a person with dementia. It's scary and lonely and heartbreaking.
I cried while interviewing my parents for this story, and choked up talking to my friend, and a stranger. It was an eye opening experience, and I'm grateful they shared their stories.
An excellent journalistic piece that integrates the human element successfully with the stakes of the successes of scientific research (here finding cures for the many forms of dementia). Also, an excellent example of why science journalists are essential in bridging the gap between the hard reality
An excellent journalistic piece that integrates the human element successfully with the stakes of the successes of scientific research (here finding cures for the many forms of dementia). Also, an excellent example of why science journalists are essential in bridging the gap between the hard reality of patients and their families, and the surgical/cold eye of scientists and healthcare practitioners on these devastating diseases.
What's SCOTUS up to?
SCOTUS justices are stumped in a case with “massive economic significance.” How the court rules on a dispute over a tax refund between a now-bankrupt company and its subsidiary could affect hundreds of millions of dollars in tax refunds annually and how contracts are drafted nationwide.
US Supreme Court cases are highly technical and often seem dull. But there is almost always something charming about even the most difficult or dry matters and this tax refund case the justices heard yesterday was no exception.
Meet Bob Richards and his rule.
Its chief justice sounded almost socialist in the ARCO Montana case. John Roberts urged private landowners to think big picture in their bid for a smelter owner to shoulder cleanup costs for 20,000 acres of land in Montana.
A fight between private landowners in Montana and ARCO, owner of the now defunct Anaconda Smelter that spewed toxins into the big sky of Big Sky Country for a century, brought out the communitarian in chief justice John Roberts. ARCO and the federal government argue that the landowners can't sue the
A fight between private landowners in Montana and ARCO, owner of the now defunct Anaconda Smelter that spewed toxins into the big sky of Big Sky Country for a century, brought out the communitarian in chief justice John Roberts. ARCO and the federal government argue that the landowners can't sue the company in state court for environmental remediation because the EPA is already in charge of the smelter site and additional efforts could upset the delicate balance there.
You might expect that conservative justices would have sided with private landowners, and some seemed to do that, but the issues at stake here appeared to touch the chief deeply. He emphasized the greater good and the big picture beyond Big Sky Country.
Changing for climate change
No offense, but...
Visit Rwanda, Again!
Old dogs, new math
Enjoyed that? Share with a friend!
The problems we’re solving for on Earth will only follow us to Mars
QuartzAfricans receive more spam texts than mobile users everywhere else
Quartz AfricaIt’s not just you. Netflix really is doubling its Christmas content every year
QuartzHow the best teams deal with failure
Quartz at WorkDecades after his disappearance, unions still suffer from Jimmy Hoffa’s legacy
QuartzThe “right” amount to spend on Christmas gifts, according to an economist
QuartzBitcoin money laundering is a classically dumb crime
QuartzWhen to book your flights and hotel for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics
QuartzFrom equality to climate change, India’s Gen Z is all about dating with a cause on Tinder
Quartz IndiaEven the Modi government is feeling the heat of India’s economic slowdown
Quartz India