Skip to navigationSkip to content

Salary transparency: Workplace trends, February 2022.

Salary transparency can make wages fairer, and makes pay reflective of performance.

A man passes money through a small window
This story was published on our The Memo from Quartz at Work newsletter, Practical advice for modern workers everywhere.
  • Cassie Werber
By Cassie Werber

Cassie writes about the world of work.

Published

How would you feel if your coworkers knew exactly how much you earned?

For some, the idea is uncomfortable and stressful. For others, like younger people and staffers at companies that already practice pay transparency, it might feel like a natural step toward a more just workplace. The logic of making compensation transparent is that it becomes harder to pay people unfairly when salaries are open to public scrutiny.

A new study supports this argument with data.

Tomasz Obloj of HEC Paris and Todd Zenger from the University of Utah’s business school compiled the salaries of almost 100,000 US-based academics in eight states over a period of 14 years. Their findings, set to be published in the journal Nature Human Behaviour later this year, show that pay transparency (which schools in some states practice as a matter of course) had a big effect on both pay equity—how fairly the academics were paid, particularly in regards to gender—and on pay equality—how similarly the academics were paid compared with their peers.

Not surprisingly, once wages and rewards become transparent, there is both internal and external pressure to close those gaps, Obloj observed.

But the extent to which making pay transparent helps erase unfairness was remarkable, he said. The gender pay gap, for example, was reduced by up to 45% in transparent organizations compared to those in the study that didn’t disclose such data.

Inequality of pay also dropped by about 20%, Obloj said, noting that pay transparency leads to what he called overall “wage compression,” whereby all the salaries in a given organization become more similar, with fewer outliers.

Obloj and Zenger came up with a third finding that could also hold lessons for companies exploring pay transparency: When salaries were made public across organizations, the link between pay and performance was significantly weakened, by about 40%, meaning—in this case—that higher academic salaries were less closely tied to observable metrics like publications, grants, patents, or books.

The authors also noted that while work achievements were rewarded less highly in transparent companies, the link between achievement and pay was actually more clear and data-driven in transparent companies than in their non-transparent counterparts.

The question that now fascinates Obloj is whether that change in the relationship between higher pay and achievement at work is a good or a bad thing.

On one hand, companies might argue, offering pay incentives is crucial to attract and retain talent, a practice which results in people being paid very differently from one another. An organization could lose “superstars” if it couldn’t offer them much more money than other employers, Obloj said.

On the flipside, there’s an argument to be made that paying people based on performance is itself discriminatory.

For example: Academics might be given a “bump” in pay for every journal article they publish, but if most journal editors are male, and the review process tends to give preference to articles by male authors, then the performance-related reward is already structurally more likely to go to men, he explained.

Add to this the fact that female academics tend to be paid less even at entry level, which the study authors also documented, and any performance-related pay raises will only exacerbate existing unfairness. The same could well be true for other groups that don’t have the structural support (be it child care, home help, or something else) to make work achievements at the same rate as more privileged colleagues.—Cassie Werber

Should companies practice salary transparency as a matter of course? Click the mailbox below to share your opinion in an email.

Five things we learned this week 

Google souped up its parental leave package. More than 40% of its employees are in the “sandwich generation,” often looking after both kids and parents, the company said.

What does a post-NFL career look like for Tom Brady? Diet ideas, crypto currency, and athleisure wear are all on the table.

Hybrid, flexible, and distributed work are here to stay. Salesforce, HSBC, and IBM talked about returning to the office. None are going back en masse any time soon.

Unionization makes even progressive companies nervous. Apparel retailer REI said it thought a union wasn’t “needed or beneficial.”

There’s a better way to deal with difficult-to-pronounce names. Instead of “butchering” the name, ask how to pronounce it before attempting to do so.

How are you doing at remote work?

Are you a top company for remote workers? Whether you’re fully remote or distributed with a strong remote contingent, you may be eligible for Quartz’s Best Companies for Remote Workers, a new, global ranking to be published later this year on Quartz at Work. Click here to submit your company for consideration.

30-second case study 

In 1936, Eddie Bauer went on a hunting trip in Alaska, dressed in—what else in 1937?—a wool winter coat. It didn’t take long before Bauer started suffering from hypothermia. After narrowly escaping death, the outdoorsman and budding clothier thought, “Yeahhh, we can do better than that.” Three years later, the “blizzard-proof jacket” was born: an olive green quilted puffer coat that Bauer went on to manufacture for the US Air Force, and then the world.

For Bauer, necessity was the mother of invention. But since that fateful gentlemen’s hunt, puffer jackets have, well, blown up: Today, you can find oversized puffers, luxury puffers, $1,000 puffers, and plenty of puffers that are Everest-ready.  🎧  To learn more about how Bauer’s novel coat evolved into a status symbol, listen to this week’s episode of the Quartz Obsession podcast, the first of Season 2.

Listen on: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Google | Stitcher

Sponsored by Alumni Ventures 

Not yet a Quartz member? Sign up now for a 7-day free trial.

You got The Memo!

This week’s Memo was written by Cassie Werber and edited by Francesca Donner. The Quartz at Work team can be reached at work@qz.com.

Did someone forward you this email? Sign up for future installments here. Get the most out of Quartz by downloading our app and becoming a member.

 

📬 Sign up for our weekly email on the future of work.

By providing your email, you agree to the Quartz Privacy Policy.