Welcome to Quartz’s newsletter on the economic possibilities of the extraterrestrial sphere. Please forward widely, and let me know what you think. This week: Starlink’s environmental challenges, probing Mars, and a shortcut to Lightspeed.
🚀 🚀 🚀
SpaceX’s ability to launch spacecraft in huge quantities shouldn’t be underappreciated. In less than two years, SpaceX launched more than 1,000 new satellites for its Starlink constellation, becoming the world’s largest satellite operator and increasing the number of active satellites by nearly a third.
How extraordinary is that?
Not very, according to SpaceX, which is pushing back against environmental complaints that could have major consequences for satellite operators trying to launch huge new constellations in low-earth orbit.
In the US, satellite activity is regulated by the Federal Communications Commission, which is responsible for ensuring that spacecraft transmitting under US jurisdiction don’t interfere with each other and that the US meets its international space treaty obligations.
In practice, the FCC is a venue for companies battling over valuable real estate in orbit and on the radio spectrum. With SpaceX far ahead of potential competitors in the internet satellite business, it has a target on its back. But it also has to reckon with the other burden of being the first mover: the unanticipated consequences of all those bold moves.
One of those surprises was the fact that SpaceX satellites, particularly shortly after launch, are unusually visible from earth. Astronomers fear that as the number of satellites grows, some very expensive terrestrial telescopes won’t be able to work as well. To its credit, SpaceX has stepped up its efforts to reduce the glare.
When astronomers first came to grips with the problem of SpaceX’s satellites, one law student suggested that US environmental regulations could give astronomers a chance to challenge SpaceX’s license to operate its satellites. Experienced attorneys I spoke to at the time thought there was little chance that an outside lawsuit, making arguments not mentioned in the pre-license debate, would threaten SpaceX’s activities.
Now SpaceX is seeking to modify its license by shifting more than 2,000 planned satellites from an orbit above 1,000 kilometers down to lower altitudes between 540 km and 570 km. One of its competitors, ViaSat, has asked the FCC to perform a full environmental review of this request, an action that becomes more likely in the midst of a regulatory procedure.
“Most things that the FCC does are not going to have a significant environmental impact,” John Janka, an attorney who works on regulatory issues at ViaSat, told Quartz. “SpaceX is asking for 42,000 operating satellites which have a lifetime of five years. Over a 15-year FCC license term, we’re talking about well over 100,000 satellites. This is unprecedented and it is appropriate for the agency to consider these consequences.”
ViaSat’s concerns have included traditional issues like radio interference and the potential for orbital collisions and debris. These technical issues are the bread and butter of satellite regulation, but the unusually large number of satellites in SpaceX’s constellation increases the complications.
ViaSat notes that SpaceX originally said its satellites would become inoperable at a rate of less than 1%, but losses have been closer to 2.8%. Failed satellites that can’t be controlled eventually fall out of orbit and burn up, but in the meantime present a higher risk of collision. The lower orbit of these spacecraft is also more crowded than the old one, and the satellites will by flying closer together.
Astroscale, a company developing technology to service satellites and clean orbital debris, concurred with ViaSat that the FCC needs to do more analysis on the risk of Starlink collisions. Charity Weeden, a policy executive at Astroscale, wrote that there is “not yet sufficient certainty or evidence of the modification’s increase in space safety” and that SpaceX’s arguments “lack mathematical substantiation.”
ViaSat’s list of concerns includes less widely discussed ways that space activity can pollute. Rocket exhaust and spacecraft, from defunct satellites to rockets, burning up in the atmosphere can leave behind particulate pollution. The Aerospace Corporation released a preliminary estimate last year that this could increase from the current annual level of “roughly 100 metric tons to between 800 and 3,200 metric tons.” The researcher who led the study, William Ailor, told SpaceNews that “given the present and anticipated increase in large constellations, there is potential for environmental impact.”
SpaceX, which declined interview requests on this topic over the last month, isn’t impressed with ViaSat’s complaints. Its lawyers called ViaSat’s arguments “anti-competitive gamesmanship” that is “self-serving and misguided,” and complained about its “feigned interest in environmental protection.”
In its filings, SpaceX argues that lowering its satellites would actually decrease their impact on astronomers, an idea endorsed by the American Astronomical Society, and make them safer, since failed satellites will burn up sooner at lower altitudes. In the end, its asserts that since these specific satellites were already approved for launch, any environmental concerns about its modifications should be judged in comparison to that status quo.
That argument could win at the FCC, but the timing of the dispute might hurt SpaceX. The top FCC official when it approved SpaceX’s license, Ajit Pai, stepped down with the new administration. Now Jessica Rosenworcel is the acting chair, and she has expressed concern about space debris before.
“The Biden administration has indicated that it intends to focus on environmental issues and…that it is committed to a science-based analysis underlying its policy-making,” Janka says. “Assuming they are going to do what they say, I imagine they would be interested in looking a these issues.”
For the rest of us, there’s a bigger issue: SpaceX is hardly the player with plans to loft thousands of new satellites; ViaSat, too, plans to expand its network. Orbital collisions and the potential for atmospheric pollution as spacecraft burn up in orbit are only going to get more likely, and it might behoove someone to look into it rigorously.
SpaceX argues that the environmental regulations at hand can only be applied by the FCC if “extraordinary circumstances” suggest its activities may have a “significant impact.”
The incredible growth in satellite deployment in the recent years seems extraordinary, but don’t take my word for it. Consider how a less modest SpaceX described its own work to the FCC when requesting this very modification, noting the “unprecedented deployment of hundreds of satellites within months of the Commission granting SpaceX’s first modification.”
🌘 🌘 🌘
This week, we saw two exploration missions arrive in Mars orbit, one launched by the United Arab Emirates, the other by China. The two nations become the fifth and sixth space powers, respectively, to arrive at the Red Planet. The UAE’s Hope mission will orbit Mars, using remote sensors to seek new data below. China’s Tianwen-1 will attempt to deploy a lander and a rover on the Martian surface, although that effort has been pushed back to April. A US mission, Mars 2020, is expected to arrive and attempt to deploy a lander next week.
Notably, the first color image from data gathered on Mars was hand-painted. When data from a TV camera on the Mariner 4 probe arrived in 1965, researchers didn’t wait for computer processing and used the information in paint-by-numbers fashion to produce this image:
👀 Read this 👀
The role of remote work after the pandemic is hard to assess: If some found they could be productive outside the office and didn’t much miss their commutes, others learned to miss the serendipity of being alongside colleagues and, perhaps, how a little distance from family, pets, and noisy neighbors makes a big difference.
Software like Zoom and Slack has made the remote transition possible, but still puts us in little boxes (and sometimes makes us cats). My Quartz colleague Nico Rivero talked to the people behind a “virtual office” that aims to “replicate the warmth and liveliness of real-life interactions,” and found that whether they and their competitors succeed could determine if remote work really takes over. Read more in our field guide to the digital workplace.
Shortcut to Lightspeed. It can be difficult to invest in the space industry for the average person, since so many promising companies remain privately held. One example is Telesat, which aims to build a new communications constellation called Lightspeed in low-earth orbit. The firm isn’t public yet—but another space company, Loral, owns more than 60% of Telesat. Analysts at Lightshed Partners argue that this makes buying Loral stock a smart way to gain exposure to a new space company. With fund managers like ARK Invest plotting strategies to gain exposure to the space market, expect more interest in tactics like this one.
The very model of a modern astronaut. I missed last week’s space tourism announcement, this time that SpaceX has chartered a crew Dragon to a billionaire, who plans to fly alongside the winner of his company’s marketing contest, plus a healthcare worker from St. Jude’s Children’s Hospital, and a lucky donor to the charitable healthcare center. The Atlantic’s Marina Koren wrote a smart piece about the changing nature of the contemporary astronaut, even as the risks of human spaceflight remain high.
Lunar Heavy. SpaceX won a $331 million contract this week to launch the Lunar Gateway, a habitat that will orbit the moon and provide a kind of way station for astronauts visiting earth’s nearest neighbor. The mission is planned for 2024 and will use a Falcon Heavy rocket modified to carry the large payload. The Gateway’s role in a lunar return has waxed and waned in recent years, but this decision is an acknowledgement that no other rocket—such as the SLS or perhaps ULA’s forthcoming Vulcan—could be expected to launch this hardware anytime soon.
Adieu, Shelby. Alabama Republican senator Richard Shelby said this week he would not seek reelection after his term ends in 2022. Shelby, 86, has been the dominant political figure in his state for decades, and as a senior member of the committee that disburses public funds, he has used his power to boost space projects in his state, most notably the Space Launch System rocket, which has cost taxpayers more than $14 billion over the last 16 years and may fly for the first time next year.
Shelby’s single-minded dedication to backing traditional space projects in his state has been the subject of criticism in recent years, as it prohibited the adoption of new technologies and approaches. When former NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine publicly contemplated using new commercial rockets instead of the SLS, Shelby told him to resign or change his mind.
This was issue 83 of our newsletter. Hope your week is out of this world! Please send your thoughts on the need for environmental review of megaconstellations, hopes for this year’s Mars missions, tips, and informed opinions to email@example.com.
- RUNNING UP THE CHARTSHow much is Kate Bush making from “Running Up That Hill”?Quartz • June 27, 2022
- TRAVEL APARTHEIDHow powerful is your country’s passport?Quartz • January 16, 2022
- RUNNER UPThese are the next startup investment hotspots in west AfricaQuartz Africa • June 30, 2022
- PARALLEL REALITYDelta is experimenting with flight information boards that know who you are and where you’re goingQuartz • July 2, 2022
- #NOTALLMENSarah Silverman’s rape tips for men really annoyed a lot of menQuartz • March 23, 2015
- THE PRIVATE SYMPHONYHow the Sony Walkman changed everythingQuartz • July 1, 2022
- ON NOTICETesla is killing off coal and gas plants with its giant battery projectsQuartz • June 29, 2022
- HOLLYWOOD DETOUR“Top Gun: Maverick” shows Hollywood can survive without China’s film marketQuartz • June 28, 2022