To call the evidence “hearsay” seems a little reductive—after all, the president himself admitted to the conversation, and the White House released a record (though not a transcript) of the call. But even then, Graham seems to forget—or is ignoring the fact—that the last presidential impeachment, against Bill Clinton in 1998, was in fact significantly advanced by hearsay.

Leading up to the impeachment, a key role was that of Linda Tripp, a civil servant who, starting in 1997, began bringing forward rumors about Clinton (for instance, implying a relationship between the president and White House staffer Kathleen Willey), then shared the recording of her calls with Monica Lewinsky, for whom she was a confidante. Since she was not present at the moment of the encounters between Lewinsky and Clinton, Tripp’s information was quintessentially hearsay—though she had recordings, it was still not based on direct evidence.

Still, this didn’t stop the Republican House from impeaching Clinton. Graham, too, who was a member of the House Judiciary Committee at the time of that impeachment, voted in favor of it.

📬 Sign up for the Daily Brief

Our free, fast, and fun briefing on the global economy, delivered every weekday morning.