The US timber industry has been crippled by double whammy of trade war and Covid-19

A worker loads harvested timber on a truck (not seen) at a timber processing site on the outskirts of Hefei, Anhui province September 2, 2011.…
A worker loads harvested timber on a truck (not seen) at a timber processing site on the outskirts of Hefei, Anhui province September 2, 2011.…
Image: Reuters/Jianan Yu
We may earn a commission from links on this page.

The forestry sector—landowners, logging companies, and sawmills—have lost an estimated $1.1 billion in 2020. Devastating wildfires and Hurricane Laura have played a part, but the Covid-19 pandemic has also contributed to significant losses. If workers are required to stay home, then no trees will be felled or logs sawed into lumber.

These losses have been exacerbated and amplified because of a longstanding trade war that has severely curbed the sale of US forestry products to foreign markets, particularly China.

I am a professor of economics with a specialty in international agricultural trade, trade policy, and global food demand. My work at the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture is informed by my nearly 10 years as a senior economist with US Department of Agriculture (USDA) researching international trade issues affecting agriculture and forestry.

The US-China connection

Forest product exports in the US, including logs and lumber, were valued at $9.6 billion in 2018, according to the USDA. Forest products are the third leading US agricultural export sector after soybeans and corn. In 2018, China accounted for nearly $3 billion of US forest product exports.

The forest products relationship between China and the US is complex. The US sells logs and lumber to China; China uses the logs and lumber to produce finished wood products, such as furniture and hardwood flooring; and China exports these finished wood products to the world. Interestingly, the US market is the leading destination for these exports. In 2018, US imports of wooden furniture and other wood products from China exceeded $9 billion, according to the US Census Bureau.

This raises an obvious question: Why doesn’t the US simply make furniture and flooring? The answer is wages. The wage differential between US and Chinese workers makes it more profitable to sell logs and lumber to China and then buy back finished wood products.

Since the demand for products like logs and lumber is directly linked to the demand for finished wood products like furniture and flooring, any decline in the latter negatively affects US forest product exports. To say that what happens in China does not necessarily stay in China is an understatement.

A vulnerable industry takes the hit

Covid-19 has caused a major disruption on US forest exports and hindered production because of lockdowns, business closures, and production stoppages. Many of these supply disruptions started in China, where lumber was being turned into furniture, chairs, and other goods where the pandemic began.

However, another major factor has been the interruption of demand because of decreased incomes and delayed purchases by consumers. In the US, furniture sales decreased as much as 66% in April 2020 when stay-at-home orders went into effect. As of August of this year, US imports of wood furniture and other wood products from China were down by nearly $2 billion, or 40%.

Consequently, US forest product exports as of August 2020 had dropped by more than $670 million overall, with exports to China down by more than $100 million. Geographically, most of these losses are in the South, a loss of $246 million, followed by the west, with losses of $183 million, and the northeast, with losses of $143 million. In addition, these substantial losses are compounded by a multiplier effect that go beyond the raw export numbers.

In my state of Tennessee, for instance, the forestry sector provided nearly 100,000 jobs and had an annual economic impact of more than $24 billion in 2017, accounting for nearly 3% of Tennessee’s economy. This, of course, was before the Covid-19 pandemic and the US trade war, which has devastated the forestry sector. When considering the related activities associated with the forestry sector, such as trucking or equipment, total income and job losses are likely double the direct losses from export sales.

The economic fallout of the trade war

Prior to the pandemic, the US-China trade war had already made the forestry sector vulnerable because of the tariffs that the Chinese government imposed on US timber and the resulting loss in exports. The industry was in a crisis when Covid-19 hit.

In 2018, president Trump ordered that tariffs be imposed on Chinese imports, including a 10% tariff on furniture and related goods from China. In retaliation, the Chinese government imposed tariffs on many US agricultural goods, including 25% tariffs on US logs and lumber. This double taxation resulted in nearly halving the export to China—from $3 billion in 2018 to $1.6 billion in 2019. The trade war, compounded by Covid-19, has had a major negative effect on forest products export sales—from timber harvest and lumber production to timber exports—which hurts working people including loggers and mill workers. Sawmills, in particular, have taken a serious hit.

How is this related to the current pandemic? In January 2020, the US and China signed the Phase One Trade Agreement. Based on the details of the agreement, timber and other forest product exports to China were expected to reach more than $4 billion in 2020. The fact that current export sales to China, as of August of 2020, were only $1 billion suggests that Covid-19 is having an even larger impact than the numbers reveal.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.