Quartz
Subscribe
Quartz
Subscribe
Edition
Business News
A.I.
Technology
Money & Markets
Leadership
Lifestyle
Latest

Get Quartz in your inbox

Free daily briefing on global business news.

Business News
AirlinesAutomobilesFoodPharmaceuticalsPolitics & GovernmentRetail & EcommerceSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Technology
A.I.ComputingConsumer TechSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Money & Markets
Economic IndicatorsMarketsPersonal FinanceEarnings
Lifestyle
Cars & BikesCollectingEntertainmentFood & Fine DiningHealth and FitnessReal EstateTravel
Quartz

Global business news for a smarter world

Topics

  • Business News
  • Money & Markets
  • Tech & Innovation
  • Generation A.I.
  • Lifestyle
  • Leadership

Products

  • Daily Brief
  • Weekly Digest
  • Member Benefits
  • Quartz Pro

Legal

  • Sitemap
  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Advertising

© 2026 Quartz Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

Economic Indicators

A US appellate court has refused to immediately reinstate Donald Trump’s travel ban

The White House’s efforts to get US president Donald Trump’s travel ban reinstated has been dealt a preliminary blow by a federal appeals court.

By April Siese·1 min read·Updated July 20, 2022
Add QZ to Google

The White House’s efforts to get US president Donald Trump’s travel ban reinstated has been dealt a preliminary blow by a federal appeals court.

Two judges in San Francisco denied the government’s emergency motion to lift the temporary injunction ordered on Feb. 3 by judge James Robart in Seattle. A reply from the Trump administration is now due on Monday (Feb. 6). For now, citizens from seven majority-Muslim countries, as well as vetted refugees approved for resettlement, are allowed into the US.

Daily Brief

The essential business news, delivered fresh every morning.

Join 500,000+ readers who start their day with Quartz.

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Trump lashed out against the Seattle court’s decision this weekend, referring to Robart as a “so-called judge” and calling his opinion “ridiculous.”

A more restrained argument put before the 9th Circuit Court in San Francisco on Feb. 4 came from lawyers at the US Department of Justice, who claimed that the injunction “contravenes the constitutional separation of powers; harms the public by thwarting enforcement of an Executive Order issued by the nation’s elected representative responsible for immigration matters and foreign affairs; and second-guesses the President’s national security judgment about the quantum of risk posed by the admission of certain classes of aliens and the best means of minimizing that risk.”

The judges denied the DOJ’s request for an immediate restoration of the executive order.

Further appeal potentially could be taken to the US Supreme Court, though it would take five votes to overturn the panel decision. Right now the high court is evenly split with four liberal and four conservative members, and one seat still vacant since the death last year of justice Antonin Scalia.

Trump was confident he’d prevail, telling reporters Saturday night at a Red Cross benefit at Mar-a-Lago “we’ll win.” He’s yet to comment on the 9th Circuit Court’s decision.