Quartz
Subscribe
Quartz
Subscribe
Edition
Business News
A.I.
Technology
Money & Markets
Leadership
Lifestyle
Latest

Get Quartz in your inbox

Free daily briefing on global business news.

Business News
AirlinesAutomobilesFoodPharmaceuticalsPolitics & GovernmentRetail & EcommerceSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Technology
A.I.ComputingConsumer TechSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Money & Markets
Economic IndicatorsMarketsPersonal FinanceEarnings
Lifestyle
Cars & BikesCollectingEntertainmentFood & Fine DiningHealth and FitnessReal EstateTravel
Quartz

Global business news for a smarter world

Topics

  • Business News
  • Money & Markets
  • Tech & Innovation
  • Generation A.I.
  • Lifestyle
  • Leadership

Products

  • Daily Brief
  • Weekly Digest
  • Member Benefits
  • Quartz Pro

Legal

  • Sitemap
  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Advertising

© 2026 Quartz Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

Business News

World Press Photo’s unusual pick for photo of the year reveals a world coming apart

“Photo of the year,” the top honor of the prestigious World Press Photo contest has been awarded, and it is an unusual choice: A shockingly clear image of the assassination of Russia’s Turkish ambassador Andrei Karlov in Ankara.

By Johnny Simon·2 min read·Updated July 20, 2022
Add QZ to Google

“Photo of the year,” the top honor of the prestigious World Press Photo contest has been awarded, and it is an unusual choice: A shockingly clear image of the assassination of Russia’s Turkish ambassador Andrei Karlov in Ankara.

Karpov was shot by gunman Mevlut Mert Altintas in December, at a photography exhibit where Altintas reportedly shouted “Do not forget Aleppo!” Although several photographers were at the scene, AP Burhan Ozbilici’s image of Altintas shouting with gun in hand quickly became iconic, and was today awarded this year’s top recognition.

Daily Brief

The essential business news, delivered fresh every morning.

Join 500,000+ readers who start their day with Quartz.

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Ozbilici’s image is a searing one that became the story from the moment it was transmitted. But it’s a strange pick for World Press Photo’s greatest prize.

The prize goes to a single picture that sums up a year of news, and winning images have often been “more poetic and open to interpretation,” as World Press Photo’s managing director Lars Boering noted to the New York Times.

Many past ”photos of the year” have been little-known images that reveal the human suffering behind a headline—they rarely spotlight the actual perpetrators of violence. Last year’s winner was a dark, grainy photo of a child being passed underneath a barbed wire fence.

Why then, does this year’s award go to a strikingly literal image that much of the world has already seen?

As World Press Photo’s jury members explain, Ozbilici’s picture speaks not just to the incident, but to the larger feeling of a world coming apart. Mary Calvert, a renowned photojournalist and a World Press jurist remarked, “It was a very, very difficult decision, but in the end we felt that the picture of the Year was an explosive image that really spoke to the hatred of our times.”

Photojournalist João Silva, another jury member, said:

Right now I see the world marching towards the edge of an abyss . . . I feel that what is happening in Europe, what is happening in America, what is happening in the Far East, Middle East, Syria, and this image to me talks of it. It is the face of hatred.

Noting his dissent on the image, jury chair Stuart Franklin wrote in the Guardian:

It’s a photograph of a murder, the killer and the slain, both seen in the same picture, and morally as problematic to publish as a terrorist beheading.
Unlike the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in Sarajevo in 1914, the crime had limited political consequences. Placing the photograph on this high pedestal is an invitation to those contemplating such staged spectaculars: it reaffirms the compact between martyrdom and publicity.

World Press Photo has in the past succeeded in championing pictures that add humanity and context to the most charged topics. But this year, its controversial choice highlights chaos, and feeling of immediate threat. Pushed, perhaps, by a widespread sense of growing angst in the world, this year’s jury has exceptionally opted not to examine global conflict from a safe distance, but to confront it head on.