The arrests of two people for insulting President John Magufuli on social media has heightened concerns among journalists and analysts in Tanzania that an atmosphere of fear and self-censorship is being created in newsrooms across the country.
In June, a man was charged for allegedly using abusive language against the president on the social networking platform WhatsApp. This follows another case earlier in the month where an individual was convicted and sentenced to three years in jail for calling Magufuli an “idiot”on Facebook.
Neither of those arrested was a journalist. However, in mid-July the managing editor of the daily newspaper Mwananchi and one of his reporters were questioned by the police, after the newspaper published a feature story about law enforcement.
This turn of events has created a situation where journalists are reluctant to report on tough stories for fear that they may fall afoul of authorities. Meanwhile, editors play it safe out of concerns that their publications might get shut down.
“I am limited in what I can report. I feel that I have a responsibility to report what would not upset the government,” said an editor at one of the nation’s largest newspapers, who requested anonymity so she could speak candidly.
Tanzania has a history of banning outlets deemed to have overstepped the boundaries of acceptable public discourse. Even so, the country is ranked as having one of the better press freedom records in Africa, according to Freedom House.
The climate worsened last year when then-President Jakaya Kikwete signed into law a cybercrime actwhich made it illegal to share content online that is deemed “false, deceptive, misleading or inaccurate.” Accompanying this law was another piece of legislation, the statistics bill, which was enacted at the same time.
The Kikwete government defended the laws, saying they were instituted to protect the country against the erroneous use of data and the emergence of new threats from illegal online behavior. But critics say it has criminalized the use of data not sanctioned by the National Bureau of Statistics, and that the two laws together seem to focus more on policing speech than combating crime.
Erick Kabendera, an investigative journalist with the regional publication The East African, said it is definitely the case that journalists are pulling their punches.
“Everybody is worried if you do a story whether the government will react,” he said. “This inevitably leads to self-censorship.”
Public opinion also appears to be on the journalists’ side. A poll by research network Afrobarometer, conducted before Kikwete’s anti-press laws were approved, found that the majority of respondents believed the government should not be able to censor journalists.
Advice for journalists
Kabendera offered some tips on how journalists can move forward in this restrictive climate.
“Exercise caution. You need to have checks and balances [in newsrooms],” he said.
Cowering in fear and self-censoring is not the way forward, he added. Instead, he advised his colleagues to be vigilant in their reporting and make sure they don’t give the government reasons to come after them. “But if you become too cautious or worried about the government too much, you are not going to do anything,” he said. “You will only end up publishing safe stories with no impact.”
Fausta Musokwa, an analyst with an organization that funds investigative journalism, the Tanzania Media Foundation, said this is a time for journalists to report and educate the public and get them engaged about the effects of the laws.
“Generally, our journalists are not critical and this [could be] another missed opportunity to aggressively cover the issue,” she said. “There is room to report on the law without it being a fight against government.
“The [statistics law] is the government’s way of saying that journalists are being irresponsible with data,” she added. “It’s the role of journalists to show that’s not the case.”
International Center for Journalists.