SearchNewsletters
Logo
HomeLatestBusiness NewsMoney & MarketsTech & InnovationA.I.LifestyleLeadership✉️ Emails🎧 Podcasts
Logo
FacebookXInstagramYoutubeRSS Feed
SitemapAboutAccessibilityPrivacyTerms of ServiceAdvertising
© 2026 Quartz Media Network. All Rights Reserved.
A.I.

Top AI scientists have a warning for us

Scientists from OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic, and Meta warn that our ability to monitor AI reasoning could disappear as models evolve

ByEmily Price
Share to XShare to FacebookShare to RedditShare to EmailShare to Link
Add Quartz on Google
Share to XShare to FacebookShare to RedditShare to EmailShare to Link

Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg via Getty Images

In a rare show of unity, scientists from AI heavyweights OpenAI, Google $GOOGL DeepMind, Meta $META, and Anthropic have set aside their competitive instincts to raise a shared alarm: We might be about to lose our best tool for understanding how AI thinks.

More than 40 researchers from these rival labs co-authored a new paper arguing that the current ability to observe an AI model’s reasoning — via step-by-step internal monologues written in human language — could soon vanish.

For now, advanced AI systems like OpenAI’s o1 and others have begun to “think out loud,” working through problems using chains of thought that humans can read. That transparency, where the model is sharing its thought process, is one of the most important tools in ensuring AI safety.

When models make questionable decisions, exploit weaknesses, or even hint at misaligned goals, their internal reasoning often reveals the problem before it manifests externally. It’s become a kind of early warning system — one that researchers say may be more fragile than we realize.

Why the concern? As AI models become more powerful and training techniques evolve — especially those that prioritize outcomes over process — there’s a growing risk that models will stop using human-readable reasoning altogether. Instead, they could develop internal processes that are faster, more efficient, and completely opaque. Researchers have already seen signs of models abandoning English in favor of unintelligible shortcuts. Some cutting-edge designs even skip language altogether, operating in mathematical space where there’s nothing for humans to observe.

The researchers behind this new warning aren’t calling for a slowdown of progress — but they are calling for safeguards. Standardized transparency evaluations, more robust monitoring techniques, and serious consideration about which model designs to pursue may be the only way to preserve visibility into AI decision-making. If this capability disappears, we won’t just lose oversight — we could lose control.

📬 Sign up for the Daily Brief

Our free, fast and fun briefing on the global economy, delivered every weekday morning.

Related Content

Fed minutes reveal divides over interest rates in Kevin Warsh's first meeting
Meta's smart glasses will now shut off the camera if you tamper with the privacy light