Quartz
Subscribe
Quartz
Subscribe
Edition
Business News
A.I.
Technology
Money & Markets
Leadership
Lifestyle
Latest

Get Quartz in your inbox

Free daily briefing on global business news.

Business News
AirlinesAutomobilesFoodPharmaceuticalsPolitics & GovernmentRetail & EcommerceSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Technology
A.I.ComputingConsumer TechSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Money & Markets
Economic IndicatorsMarketsPersonal FinanceEarnings
Lifestyle
Cars & BikesCollectingEntertainmentFood & Fine DiningHealth and FitnessReal EstateTravel
Quartz

Global business news for a smarter world

Topics

  • Business News
  • Money & Markets
  • Tech & Innovation
  • Generation A.I.
  • Lifestyle
  • Leadership

Products

  • Daily Brief
  • Weekly Digest
  • Member Benefits
  • Quartz Pro

Legal

  • Sitemap
  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Advertising

© 2026 Quartz Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

Tech & Innovation

Amazon's dominance has limits: Here's what consumers still buy directly from makers

Amazon seems like the everything store, but the online marketplace may have reached its peak

By Michelle Cheng·2 min read·Updated January 19, 2023
Add QZ to Google

Despite its retail dominance, Amazon $AMZN has yet to conquer fashion.

According to survey data from market research firm Forrester, consumers in some categories are still more likely to go directly to the manufacturer than to Amazon to buy products. Businesses in the fashion industry in particular have stronger digital sales through their own websites than on Amazon.

Daily Brief

The essential business news, delivered fresh every morning.

Join 500,000+ readers who start their day with Quartz.

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

That’s because apparel companies have had a history of selling directly to consumers, both within physical retail stores and online, said Sucharita Kodali, a retail analyst at Forrester who conducted the 2021 survey. These companies, she said, were some of the earliest players to be savvy about email marketing, and its ability to create loyalty with customers. Shifting online was never a heavy lift for most fashion retailers.


Nike $NKE, for example, has been shifting away from selling to retailers in recent years, instead focusing on selling products directly to consumers. In 2021, 39% of brand sales came directly through Nike, compared to 16% a decade earlier. The move makes sense. Margins are higher when there’s no middleman taking a cut, and it allows the company to be more in control of its brand.

Consumer packaged goods


Meanwhile, businesses in consumer packaged goods (CPG)—think food, beverages, and toiletries—have a stronger presence on Amazon compared to the manufacturer’s own site or wholesale sites like Walmart $WMT or Costco $COST.

Part of the challenge for CPG companies is that it’s hard to sell a single tube of toothpaste on a website without losing money on it. Businesses could be creative and bundle the tubes, a practice Amazon has had success with in the CPG category. But companies tend to be stuck in their old ways and afraid to spend the upfront costs of marketing a new side of the business, she said.

But Kodali argued that it’s a risk worth taking. She says that by not selling online, retailers are missing out on the valuable customer data—like demographics and emails—of which Amazon has already taken full advantage.

“You’re already sending a truck to every distribution center, so how hard is it to add a DTC order on that truck going there?” she asked.

Does Amazon still have room to grow?

Amazon has long disrupted the retail industry, forcing businesses to innovate when it comes to packaging and delivery times in order to compete for digital-savvy customers. Though Amazon has yet to dominate the fashion world, the company — like Walmart — is still one of the biggest fashion retailers in the world by volume, Kodali said.

So has Amazon reached its peak?


“Kind of,” Kodali said. “The days of the super aggressive customer acquisition policies, the aggressive pricing policies that are incredibly money-losing may be behind it.”