Musk’s moonshot? Skip the retirement fund. He says AI and robots will flood the economy with abundance — but the ride there gets bumpy, fast
Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Elon Musk has never been shy about promising the future. Last week, he took the extra step of giving the future budgeting advice. On the “Moonshots with Peter Diamandis” podcast, Musk said: “Don’t worry about squirreling money away for retirement in 10 or 20 years … It won’t matter.”
It’s a line that lands somewhere between prophecy and provocation because it’s coming from the world’s richest man, delivered with the casual certainty of someone explaining why you don’t need an umbrella in a hurricane. Musk’s argument is straightforward, and very Musk: AI and robots will drive productivity so aggressively that scarcity — the thing retirement planning quietly assumes — collapses. If he’s right, traditional retirement saving won’t just be difficult or inadequate; it’ll be beside the point.
“If any of the things that we’ve said are true, saving for retirement will be irrelevant,” he said.
The abundance pitch is the sales pitch. The asterisk is the price of admission. In the same conversation, Musk described the force behind the forecast in language that’s less personal finance and more disaster movie trailer: “I call AI and robotics the supersonic tsunami,” he said. And he doesn’t offer a comforting pause button. “There’s no on-off switch,” he added. “It is coming and accelerating.” The result, he said, is unlikely to feel like a smooth handoff from jobs to leisure. Musk promised that “the transition will be bumpy.”
That tension — utopia eventually, chaos on the way — is doing a lot of work here. Musk’s retirement line is built on a world where “universal high income” shows up on schedule, goods and services become plentiful, and the basics of life are simply handled. In a more immediate world — the one most podcast listeners actually live in — retirement planning exists because rent, health care, and time don’t negotiate.
Musk has, to be fair, been unsurprisingly consistent about this sci-fi promise. In December, responding on X $TWTR, Musk wrote: “There will be no poverty in the future and so no need to save money. There will be universal high income.”
Not every CEO doing the AI prophecy circuit is selling the same ending. Nvidia $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang has pushed a different, more plausible vision: AI makes work easier, which means we do more of it. “We will be more productive and yet still be busier because we have so many ideas,” Huang said, predicting that both he and Musk would be “busier as a result of AI.”
Goldman Sachs $GS has warned that shifts in workflow could “expose the equivalent of 300 million full-time jobs to automation.” The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2023 said 23% of jobs are expected to change by 2027, with 69 million created and 83 million eliminated. And Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has been blunter still. “AI could wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs — and spike unemployment to 10-20% in the next one to five years,” he told Axios.
Other CEOs split the difference by focusing on distribution — the part Musk gestures at, but doesn’t really solve. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has argued that a simple dividend “is not going to feel good,” and pushed instead for society to have “an ownership share in whatever AI creates,” which means “universal basic wealth,” not just checks. Bill Gates has floated a gentler destination — a shorter workweek — imagining a world where “machines can make all the food and the stuff.” Google $GOOGL DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis, meanwhile, says “radical abundance” only works if it gets “distributed fairly,” which he calls “more of a political question.”
Musk’s version depends on the part CEOs tend to glide past: governance and distribution. Even in his own telling, the world doesn’t currently have “any system … to make this go well.” If abundance arrives without a plan for who owns the machines that produce it — and who gets paid while work evaporates — a “retirement won’t matter” podcast prophecy starts sounding less like liberation and more like a threat.
Join 500,000+ readers who start their day with Quartz.
By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
