Chips underpin modern weapons, AI systems, and economic output — making their supply chains a focal point of great-power rivalry
Advanced semiconductor chips have become a geopolitical flashpoint as the United States restricts China's access to the technology powering modern militaries and artificial intelligence.
Semiconductor manufacturing sits at the center of U.S.-China tensions because chips are the foundational input for modern military systems, artificial intelligence, and economic competitiveness — and because the global supply chain for producing them is extraordinarily concentrated and difficult to replicate.
A semiconductor, or microchip, is an integrated circuit etched onto a slice of silicon. These circuits process and store data, and every digital device depends on them: smartphones, data center servers, missile guidance systems, satellites, and AI models alike. The more advanced the chip — measured by the size of the transistors it contains, now as small as a few nanometers — the more capable the system it powers.
The manufacturing of leading-edge chips is dominated by a small number of firms, most critically Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC $TSM, which produces chips for most of the world's top chip designers, including those used in AI accelerators for the largest technology companies. This concentration means that whoever can access — or deny access to — advanced chipmaking effectively controls the pace of technological development for everyone downstream.
The U.S. government has concluded that allowing China to acquire advanced chips, or the equipment to manufacture them, would accelerate China's military and AI capabilities in ways that threaten U.S. national security. That logic underlies export controls restricting the sale of high-end semiconductors to Chinese buyers, including rules designed to close workarounds that allowed Chinese firms to obtain Nvidia $NVDA AI chips through third countries.
China, in turn, views dependence on foreign chips — particularly those designed in the U.S. and manufactured in Taiwan — as a strategic vulnerability. Its government has committed hundreds of billions of dollars to building a domestic semiconductor industry, though it remains years behind the frontier in the most advanced process nodes.
The rivalry also shapes corporate decisions globally. Chip designers are expanding their product lines while navigating an environment in which their customer base, supply chains, and regulatory exposure all run through the same geopolitical fault line. Because chips cannot easily be sourced from alternative suppliers once access to the leading manufacturers is restricted, the technology functions less like a commodity and more like a strategic chokepoint — which is precisely why both governments treat control over it as a first-order policy priority.
Join 500,000+ readers who start their day with Quartz.
By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
