Quartz
Subscribe
Quartz
Subscribe
Edition
Business News
A.I.
Technology
Money & Markets
Leadership
Lifestyle
Latest

Get Quartz in your inbox

Free daily briefing on global business news.

Business News
AirlinesAutomobilesFoodPharmaceuticalsPolitics & GovernmentRetail & EcommerceSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Technology
A.I.ComputingConsumer TechSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Money & Markets
Economic IndicatorsMarketsPersonal FinanceEarnings
Lifestyle
Cars & BikesCollectingEntertainmentFood & Fine DiningHealth and FitnessReal EstateTravel
Quartz

Global business news for a smarter world

Topics

  • Business News
  • Money & Markets
  • Tech & Innovation
  • Generation A.I.
  • Lifestyle
  • Leadership

Products

  • Daily Brief
  • Weekly Digest
  • Member Benefits
  • Quartz Pro

Legal

  • Sitemap
  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Advertising

© 2026 Quartz Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

News

Supreme Court sides with port firm over Cuba dock seizure in near-unanimous vote

Havana Docks Corporation can seek compensation from cruise lines over seized Cuban property, a ruling that could invite a wave of comparable legal challenges

1 min read·Updated May 21, 2026
Add QZ to Google

Cruise lines that operated at Cuban docks taken from a U.S.-owned port company when Fidel Castro nationalized private property in 1960 can be held financially liable, the Supreme Court ruled, according to The New York Times.

The 8-to-1 decision backed Havana Docks Corporation, which had sued major cruise lines over their use of the confiscated property. Before the justices, the Trump administration argued on the company's behalf, characterizing the legal avenue — which Congress created in the 1990s — as a lever for steering foreign capital away from Cuba, according to The Times.

Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas concluded that liability attaches to any party that makes use of property "tainted by a past confiscation," and that the company met its burden simply by establishing the cruise lines had operated on the disputed docks. In dissent, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that ownership of the docks had remained with the Cuban government the entire time, and that Havana Docks' claim to the property had run out well before any cruise ship ever docked there.

A parallel lawsuit brought by Exxon Mobil seeking redress for oil and gas holdings taken from the company on the island is still awaiting a decision from the court, according to The Times.

The ruling arrived at a moment when Washington has been tightening its stance toward Havana, with the United States having moved to cut off oil supplies flowing to Cuba from Venezuela and Mexico.

Related Content

Ford is raising its full-year profit forecast after beating second-quarter earnings expectations
Visa posted 14% revenue growth as consumer and business spending held up