The stark divide between broadcast and cable highlights what a banner year it has been for cable news. Due mostly to interest in the election and pandemic, the cable networks’ ratings hit record highs this year, even as cord-cutting continues to cause a drop in TV ratings more generally.

Cable news channels tend to attract more concerned—and partisan—viewers, which can help ratings during a particularly divisive election. Fox News is the network of choice for many Republicans, while Democrats prefer MSNBC and CNN.

The broadcast networks bring in a more casual audience. And in a year in which the winner couldn’t be determined on election night, those less-interested viewers likely tuned out and went to bed early, while the more fervent observers stayed glued to cable.

The rise of social media and streaming options may have also made expendable the historically necessary act of watching broadcast networks in order to see the results. But cable networks, with their popular anchors and feverish vote-tracking efforts, add a dimension to election-night coverage you can’t necessarily get following it solely online.

The drop in election-night viewership overall was due entirely to younger viewers opting not to tune in this year. In 2016, 13.3 million Americans between the ages of 18 and 34 watched the election, while only 7.6 million viewers in that age group watched this year. Viewers 55 and older held steady from 2016, as nearly 28 million of them tuned into election night:

The median age of a Fox News viewer is roughly 65 years old. Viewers of that age are still watching the election on television, no matter how drawn-out the process may be. Almost everyone else is starting to bail on the ritual of waiting by the TV for the news to announce a winner.

📬 Sign up for the Daily Brief

Our free, fast, and fun briefing on the global economy, delivered every weekday morning.