This story incorporates reporting from Live Law, inc42 and EconoTimes.
OpenAI has filed a motion in an Indian court to dismiss a lawsuit brought by a coalition of book publishers. The publishers accuse the artificial intelligence company of violating copyright laws through its AI service, ChatGPT. The Delhi High Court is handling the case, which involves claims that ChatGPT reproduces book summaries and extracts from unlicensed copies, consequently impacting publishers’ business operations. OpenAI, however, argues that its use of data falls within the realm of fair use, utilizing publicly available information to generate responses.
According to recent court documents filed on Jan. 26, OpenAI argues that the publishers have not substantiated claims that ChatGPT relies on or uses original literary works to produce content. Instead, OpenAI states that its technology draws from existing resources on the internet that are already in the public domain. The AI firm emphasizes its adherence to fair use principles, arguing that there is no infringement involved in the operations of ChatGPT.
The Federation of Indian Publishers, which includes major global players like Penguin Random House and Bloomsbury, is spearheading the legal challenge against OpenAI. The lawsuit is part of broader global tensions where various parties — including authors, media outlets, and musicians — are alleging that AI technology providers use their work without appropriate permissions or licensing agreements.
OpenAI’s legal challenges extend beyond the book publishing industry. News agency Asian News International (ANI) has also brought a similar lawsuit against OpenAI, asserting that ChatGPT verbatim reproduces its original news content. The Delhi High Court in a separate adjudication urged restraint from media in reporting details of the submissions made by the parties involved in this case. OpenAI has presented that these cases revolve around similar issues concerning the use of public data and insists on a need for clarity on what is considered fair use in the context of AI technologies.
The Federation of Indian Publishers previously filed an intervention application to support the aforementioned cases. However, OpenAI’s legal representative, Sibal, has opposed this intervention, pointing out procedural flaws, including the Federation’s failure to provide the necessary authorization for filing. Despite these legal hurdles, the publishers remain adamant about pursuing their claims, underscoring the potential ramifications on their business models due to emerging AI technologies.
The broader context of these legal proceedings indicates a growing conflict between traditional content creators and digital technology firms over copyright interpretations. The debate has significant implications for how intellectual property laws would adapt to integrate advancements in AI and digital information dissemination.
As the Delhi High Court proceedings evolve, the outcomes could set precedents not only for similar future litigations in India but also for global discussions on the intersection of AI and copyright laws. The results of these cases may influence whether AI firms could continue using vast datasets available online under the pretext of fair use or if stricter regulations and licensing would need enforcement. The industry closely observes intelligence in the decision, awaiting direction on balancing innovation with intellectual property rights.
Quartz Intelligence Newsroom uses generative artificial intelligence to report on business trends. This is the first phase of an experimental new version of reporting. While we strive for accuracy and timeliness, due to the experimental nature of this technology we cannot guarantee that we’ll always be successful in that regard. If you see errors in this article, please let us know at qi@qz.com.