Quartz
Subscribe
Quartz
Subscribe
Edition
Business News
A.I.
Technology
Money & Markets
Leadership
Lifestyle
Latest

Get Quartz in your inbox

Free daily briefing on global business news.

Business News
AirlinesAutomobilesFoodPharmaceuticalsPolitics & GovernmentRetail & EcommerceSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Technology
A.I.ComputingConsumer TechSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Money & Markets
Economic IndicatorsMarketsPersonal FinanceEarnings
Lifestyle
Cars & BikesCollectingEntertainmentFood & Fine DiningHealth and FitnessReal EstateTravel
Quartz

Global business news for a smarter world

Topics

  • Business News
  • Money & Markets
  • Tech & Innovation
  • Generation A.I.
  • Lifestyle
  • Leadership

Products

  • Daily Brief
  • Weekly Digest
  • Member Benefits
  • Quartz Pro

Legal

  • Sitemap
  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Advertising

© 2026 Quartz Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

Markets

Investors are flooding the SEC with complaints about its plan to end quarterly earnings reports

More than 200,000 comments — the most the SEC has ever received on a proposal — came in overwhelmingly against the change

By Cris Tolomia·2 min read·Updated July 17, 2026
Add QZ to Google

J. David Ake / Getty Images


The Securities and Exchange Commission received more than 200,000 public comments on its proposal to eliminate mandatory quarterly earnings reporting, the largest comment volume in the agency's history, according to The Wall Street Journal. The comments were overwhelmingly negative.

The agency is still working to post all the submissions to its website. Despite the volume of opposition, the SEC is likely to proceed with the proposal in some form, the outlet reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

At least 20,000 submissions echoed the wording of an anonymous grassroots campaign organized around opposing any move away from quarterly reporting. An additional roughly 40,000 comments included the identical phrasing that the proposal "prevents investors like me from accessing information about companies; lets companies hide behind closed doors; and allows fraud to fester."

Respondents spanned a wide spectrum, from retirement funds and nonprofits to academics and large corporations. Lori Amann, who identified herself as a public-school teacher, drew a parallel to student grade reporting in her comment opposing the proposal. Emily McFadden, co-founder of the childhood-cancer nonprofit Little Warrior Foundation, wrote that a quarterly update had alerted the group that a potential supplier had suffered a loss that could have disrupted an immunotherapy clinical trial it funded. "Without this information, we would have misplaced donations, and wasted time that kids with cancer don't have," McFadden wrote.

Among the few supportive responses were letters from Exxon Mobil and insurance brokerage Gallagher. In its letter, Exxon argued that switching to semiannual reporting "would result in a reduction of material or timely information available to investors because material quarterly information is disclosed independently" — an outcome it said it does not anticipate. Gallagher recommended "triannual" reporting as an alternative.

When SEC Chairman Paul Atkins formally proposed allowing public companies to file earnings reports twice a year rather than four times in May, he framed the change as a way to give companies and investors flexibility to determine the reporting schedule that best suits their needs. The proposal would be optional — companies could still choose to file quarterly. It would replace three quarterly filings and one annual report with a new semiannual form called the 10-S and an annual report.

President Donald Trump has backed the idea, calling on social media for an end to mandatory quarterly reporting. The quarterly reporting requirement has been in place since 1970. During Trump's first term, the SEC studied a similar shift but did not act on it.

The public comment period closes 60 days after the proposal is published in the Federal Register. According to The Journal, the SEC must now work through the submissions, a process that may result in revisions to the proposed rule's language.

Daily Brief

The essential business news, delivered fresh every morning.

Join 500,000+ readers who start their day with Quartz.

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Related

MarketsTravelers' profit surged as catastrophe losses fell and investment income climbed
A.I.China's Moonshot AI launched its largest model ever — and rival AI stocks plunged
A.I.Microsoft's Satya Nadella slammed Anthropic's AI model restrictions in a meeting with engineers
Economic IndicatorsOil is up 11% this week. Ian threatened to crush regional infrastructure. The Strait is at risk again
MarketsFifth Third posted stronger profit as Comerica acquisition boosted its earnings