The ROI on border walls is terrible

Lousy ROI.
Lousy ROI.
Image: Reuters/Mike Blake
We may earn a commission from links on this page.

Donald Trump can’t wait to build border walls between the US and Mexico. He wants to spend $5 billion, and recently said he’s prepared to shut down the government to force Congress to approve the cost.

Walling off the border will help prevent immigrants from taking American workers’ jobs and lowering their wages, anti-immigration advocates argue. But research shows that economic losses are greater when those workers are kept out.

Researchers at Stanford University and Dartmouth College just released a detailed analysis of the return on investment of border barriers. The calculated benefits, published by the National Bureau of Economic Research: Low-skill workers earn one cent in extra income for every 19 cents the government spends on walling off Mexico.

Their findings are based on an analysis of the effects of the Secure Fence Act of 2006, which provided funding to erect 548 miles of border barriers between 2007 and 2010 at a cost of $2.3 billion or $7 per person in the US. The fencing had the intended effect of curbing immigration, but barely improved salaries for low-skill workers. The economists calculate it reduced the number of Mexican workers in the US by 82,647; incomes for the low-skill workers on the American side inched up by 36 cents a year.

“This paltry effect turns out to be the largest positive benefit of the Secure Fence Act, as all other groups of workers were harmed,” they write. (For example, the effects of the barriers shaved $4.35 off high-skill workers’ per capita income.)

Overall, reducing Mexican workers cost the US economy $2.5 billion—or $30,000 per missing Mexican worker. Mexico, meanwhile, saw a $1.2 billion GDP thanks to the workers it gained.