The names of elements in the periodic table—like lithium or beryllium—may not mean much to you today, but they are seared in your memory. Naming an element, then, is creating history.
The names of elements in the periodic table—like lithium or beryllium—may not mean much to you today, but they are seared in your memory. Naming an element, then, is creating history.
On Dec. 30, scientists in the US, Russia, and Japan were given rights to suggest the names of the final four elements on the periodic table. But before they suggest names, they will have to familiarize themselves with some strange rules that find roots in the history of discovering new elements.
Join 500,000+ readers who start their day with Quartz.
By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
As early as 1782—nearly 100 years before the modern periodic table was created—chemists realized the need for “a constant method of denomination” for these fundamental blocks of the universe. As the number of elements of began increasing, it became necessary that their names were unique and easy to remember.
After many debates and conferences, the International Union for Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) was created in 1919 to enforce standards in chemistry, including rules for naming of elements and compounds. Once established, all seemed well.
Until the Cold War.
By the 1940s, all the naturally existing elements on Earth had been discovered. Each of them had a unique number of protons in the nucleus. But the complex rules of quantum chemistry predicted that more elements should exist. If we can’t find them on Earth, scientists thought, perhaps we need to create them. The solution seemed simple: inject more protons into the nucleus of an already existing element. If the proton sticks, at least for a while, it would be considered a new element.
Two groups of scientists, one in the US and one in the Soviet Union began furiously working on creating these “synthetic elements.” IUPAC decided in 1947 that the naming rights would go to the team that definitively showed the existence of a new element, as long as an IUPAC committee also approved it. The already fierce competition between the two countries became even more intense.
In fact, in the history of chemistry, some refer to the period between the 1960s and 1990s as the “Transfermium Wars,” where trans stands for “after” element 100 (fermium). For three decades, scientists fought a war of words over the naming of elements 104 to 109. Russian, US, and German scientists had discovered some of these elements at nearly the same time, and they had their own preferences for what the elements should be called.
IUPAC stepped in to resolve the feud in 1997: elements 104 and 106 went to the Americans; elements 105 and 107 went to the Russians; and elements 108 and 109 went to the Germans. In doing so, however, it created another layer of complexity. Wilhem Koppenol, a chemist at ETH Zurich, explains IUPAC’s recommendations for naming elements that—following the drama of 1997—were put in place in 2002:
Even if these are followed, naming an element can sometimes take more than a decade. So even though the seventh row of the periodic table is now complete, it won’t be many years before we see the last of the unun-named elements gone.
