2010 study found that the average shot length has steadily decreased since 1930. The French New Wave’s popularization of the jump cut in the 1960s saw cinema appropriate faster cutting, montage, and shaky-cam techniques that reached a frenetic peak in the 2000s with films such as Saving Private Ryan, Cloverfield, and The Bourne Ultimatum. These films convey a fragmented vision of the world, and a film industry struggling to appeal to an increasingly international and disinterested audience.

But since 2013 we’ve seen an uptick in single-take feature films. Gravity, Birdman, Victoria, the forthcoming Irani Immortality, and Thunder Road, which was the breakaway Sundance hit this year, all push the boundaries of telling complex stories within the confines of one camera move. This could be connected to the resurgence of longform storytelling across media, and will be further egged on as VR becomes more accessible.

The use of point of view (POV) is another filmmaking technique that VR has heavily borrowed from. Classic films such as Peeping Tom and Psycho rely on the gaze of first-person viewer identification. But what is new are films calling attention to the constructedness of the gaze through the use of a truly embodied camera. In April 2016, Hardcore Henry was both panned by critics and hailed as an experimental technical achievement. The film is told in the form of a first-person shooter–style series of events as a cyborg searches for his kidnapped wife. We never see Henry, the protagonist, because the audience is Henry. The entire film is locked in point of view, relying on GoPro cameras and the kind of stunt work online viewers of extreme sports videos are now familiar with.

The inner gaze, consciousness, and immersion are all techniques established in the early and classical periods of cinema that have also become the foundation of VR. Film theorists like James Zborowski and Elena Drago have written extensively on how literary conventions such as stream-of-consciousness were very quickly adapted to the cinema to invoke what we now  commonly experience in VR. The ability to invoke a character’s—and by extension, the viewer’s—state of mind has been closely linked to camera movement itself. When, for example, Kim Novak’s character Judy first transforms into Madeline in Vertigo, the film achieves a kind of immersion that is integral to our understanding of a typical VR experience.

Single-take and first-person POV films harken back to strategies established long ago in films such as Lumiere’s 1896 Train Arriving at a Station and Méliès’s 1902 Trip to the Moon. But those films were striving to express a desire for the human eye and camera to be one, which could only be approximated in the most rudimentary way at that time. Now, of course, we have VR to do that.

Lumiere and Méliès’s films were not so much the crude experiments of early cinema as the template for what cinema was always meant to be: truth told by one person with a movie camera. In the century and half since the invention of the form, we’ve gotten pretty far away from that. Movies now require a crew of a thousand or more, prolonged schedules, and millions of dollars to make. Perhaps this is simply the culmination of progress, but perhaps we’ve also lost sight about what we meant to originally achieve.

So it’s not so much that VR techniques are taking filmmaking back to an older form, but that it’s rapidly evolving toward what cinema was always meant to be. In which case, the golden age of cinema is neither behind us or upon us, but, as so many filmmakers have predicted, yet to come.

📬 Sign up for the Daily Brief

Our free, fast, and fun briefing on the global economy, delivered every weekday morning.