There’s nothing special here about the boost in listener interest; after all, collaborating with bigger and more mainstream acts has long been a good way for smaller artists, particularly rappers, to get their names out.

What is new is the instantaneous way in which music streaming creates a sales boost for these artists. In the age of vinyl records, CDs, or album downloads, listeners would have to find and sample the music of a newly discovered artist for free—via services like YouTube or iTunes song previews—before committing to buying his or her album, and there was no guarantee they’d like it enough to do so.

But because streaming services offer on-demand catalogs of tens of thousands of songs all within one monthly fee (or, in the case of Spotify’s ad-supported tier, entirely for free), listeners can jump from streaming Drake’s music to Skepta’s music to Jorja Smith’s music within minutes—and rack up money for all three artists without paying an extra cent themselves. (Streaming services pay artists at a set rate per song played.) This means we might see many other artists in the future collaborating on music in the style of More Life. Never has the domino effect in music sales been so fluid.

And the business of music streaming pays out so little to artists that—unless they’re record-breaking megastars like Drake—they need all the money they can get.

📬 Sign up for the Daily Brief

Our free, fast, and fun briefing on the global economy, delivered every weekday morning.