Good morning, Quartz readers!
Domino’s Pizza delivered a case to the US Supreme Court this summer and the justices rejected it on Oct. 7, the first day of the 2019 term. The court’s action was a refusal to consider website accessibility standards that would have affected many businesses working online.
The matter stemmed from a blind man being unable to order a pizza via the company’s website or app and involves the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a law designed to ensure equal access to all. When the measure passed in 1990, internet businesses were in their infancy. But it required all companies to make reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities.
How the ADA translates in today’s age is up for debate. Various organizations offer website accessibility rules, but the US government hasn’t dictated a specific set of standards associated with the ADA, which means liability for alleged violations is resolved in litigation—creating an uncertain legal landscape.
As Domino’s noted in its petition (pdf), some courts have held that the ADA applies only to online businesses with physical locations, others have decided it imposes requirements on all online businesses, and others still have found it doesn’t apply to the internet at all.
Domino’s wanted the justices to clarify how the ADA should be read with respect to websites and apps, warning of a “tsunami” of litigation if the high court declined to clear up the confusion.
Still, Domino’s might have dodged a bullet when its case was rejected, as the justices, upon review, could have clarified contrary to Domino’s liking, with nationwide implications.
Advocates for the disabled celebrated the high court’s rejection of the case. Now the decision by the Ninth Circuit Court, which decided the ADA applies to Domino’s online, is not up for review and is the law in parts of the US, including California. “This is a significant win for the disability community,” said Sean Bradley, co-founder of AudioEye, which helps websites be legally compliant with accessibility requirements.
And while the case is a US one, it could prove a source of inspiration elsewhere, and already has people abroad talking. —Ephrat Livni
Five things on Quartz we especially liked
Redefining “Kong Girls.” For years, Hong Kong women have been stereotyped as being high-maintenance, spoiled, and apolitical. In recent months, however, many have watched in awe as they’ve taken to the protest frontlines with courage and aplomb. They’ve fought off sexist tropes from their detractors and the worsening threat of police brutality along the way. Isabella Steger looks at how the city’s female protesters are reclaiming the “basic bitch” stereotype.
Cloud visit. Bank of England officials, unlike their counterparts across the Atlantic, have never (officially) set foot in a cloud computing facility, according to the response to a records request from Quartz. But maybe they should. As entire banks are now hosted in the cloud, John Detrixhe writes about the growing systemic risks stemming from this technology, and the worry that watchdogs are falling behind.
Take a seat. In the UK, the biggest killer of men under the age of 45 is death by suicide. Loneliness and social isolation are a big reason why. Many men find it hard to connect with others, given busier lives, fewer pubs and community centers, and the behavior society expects of them. But there’s one place in particular that can help: the barber’s chair. Jenny Anderson writes about a project taking advantage of it to improve men’s mental health.
Alive and well. Earlier this month, net neutrality seemed to suffer a crushing defeat, with a Washington, DC court deciding telecoms are free to block, slow, or otherwise discriminate against content and services. But it also rejected the Federal Communications Commission’s right to strip US states of their power to regulate net neutrality as they see fit. That, explains Michael J. Coren, may make all the difference.
What’s in a name? In Africa the concept of nation states is only a bit over a century old. Not surprisingly, most of the names of African countries are remnants of a colonial legacy. Ciku Kimeria provides a tour of the unusual ways that many of the nations got their names, ranging from the mundane to the bizarre. You may never look at Gabon, Cameroon, and Sierra Leone the same way again.
Five things elsewhere that made us smarter
Nature’s competition. Nothing beats the great outdoors for satisfying the human need to explore—but for an increasingly large audience, video games come close. Setting forth in the lavishly produced worlds of Red Dead Redemption 2 and other blockbuster titles can, for some, be just as thrilling as an alpine adventure. For Outside Magazine, David Kushner considers the implications, and visits a pricey treatment center where gaming addicts try to “de-tech.”
Breaking the silence. Having a miscarriage can be the loneliest experience a woman ever endures. The emotional fallout can eclipse the physical trauma. Dealing with other people’s reactions, including in the workplace, adds to the misery. Yet, there’s a profound silence around the topic. To address that, the New York Times heard the miscarriage stories of more than 500 people.
The road ahead. Tesla owners have logged more than 1.5 billion miles on Autopilot, which performs all the functions of normal highway driving sans driver input. Critics argue a user’s attention inevitably drifts, making trips more dangerous—and sometimes fatal. But as Zachary Mider writes in Bloomberg Businessweek, the ethics are complicated. Autopilot, which Tesla views as a step toward self-driving cars, is constantly learning and could eventually save millions of lives—but it might kill some people first.
Sounding off. Donald Trump reveres the military. Many of the generals who have served under him don’t return the feeling. For the Atlantic, Mark Bowden writes about the top officers who’ve criticized the US president for, among other things, disdaining expertise, trusting only his gut, and resisting a coherent strategy (not to mention having a badly outdated notion of soldiering). His approach, they argue, is a recipe for miscalculation, which is what starts most wars.
Too easy. On YouTube, Facebook, and elsewhere, enormously popular “life hack” videos show viewers how to achieve remarkable things with simple materials. One, for instance, claims that microwaving graphite from a pencil lead can produce a small diamond. Unfortunately many of the tips are inadvisable or flat-out dangerous, as Jeff Horwitz writes in the Wall Street Journal. Don’t expect the videos, which turn a nice profit for their producers, to go away anytime soon.
Our best wishes for a relaxing but thought-filled weekend. Please send any news, comments, Autopilot arguments, and realistic life hacks to hi@qz.com. Join the next chapter of Quartz by downloading our app and becoming a member. Today’s Weekend Brief was edited by Steve Mollman and David Yanofsky.