In their study, Greitens and Truex found that 9% of respondents had been “taken for tea” by authorities in the last 10 years—a term widely used to mean an invitation, usually extended to journalists, to discuss authorities’ displeasure with some aspect of the person’s work. One respondent detailed an incident where he or she was invited to a meeting with the dean of his or her host institution, where they discussed the academic’s research in the presence of a man who did not identify his job title. The academic was told that it was “inconvenient” for him or her to continue doing research in the school’s archives. Others reported being taken away to a police station while doing research at a protest, or being asked to leave by the local government during the course of conducting fieldwork.

Around 31% of respondents said they had faced softer forms of repression, such as denial of access to archives or difficulties obtaining visas. The study suggests that academics who study sensitive topics such as “ethnicity, minorities, religion, and human rights” were more prone to encountering visa difficulties, especially for research that involves Xinjiang and Muslims.

With regards to self-censorship, the authors of the study said that a majority of respondents identified it as a problem in the field of China research, although a “significant number” asserted that they had responsibility to speak “scholarly truth to Chinese power” as foreign academics. The authors, however, acknowledged that what constitutes as self-censorship is ambiguous and contextual, particularly as researchers often also need to be mindful of the safety of their interlocutors or Chinese colleagues.

Despite the high number of respondents acknowledging the problem of self-censorship, the authors of the study said they found no indication that there was a reduction in the amount of sensitive topics being published by top journals.

The authors also note that ultimately, decisions over how to conduct academic research is a “highly personal one,” and that it is impossible to apply blanket judgments to an institution or individual’s risk when researching China. They also urge more attention to be paid to instances of Chinese academic repression in Western institutions themselves.

📬 Sign up for the Daily Brief

Our free, fast, and fun briefing on the global economy, delivered every weekday morning.