Quartz
Subscribe
Quartz
Subscribe
Edition
Business News
A.I.
Technology
Money & Markets
Leadership
Lifestyle
Latest

Get Quartz in your inbox

Free daily briefing on global business news.

Business News
AirlinesAutomobilesFoodPharmaceuticalsPolitics & GovernmentRetail & EcommerceSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Technology
A.I.ComputingConsumer TechSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Money & Markets
Economic IndicatorsMarketsPersonal FinanceEarnings
Lifestyle
Cars & BikesCollectingEntertainmentFood & Fine DiningHealth and FitnessReal EstateTravel
Quartz

Global business news for a smarter world

Topics

  • Business News
  • Money & Markets
  • Tech & Innovation
  • Generation A.I.
  • Lifestyle
  • Leadership

Products

  • Daily Brief
  • Weekly Digest
  • Member Benefits
  • Quartz Pro

Legal

  • Sitemap
  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Advertising

© 2026 Quartz Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

News

A US court says it's actually fine for Apple to sell its fancy Watch models

The intervention reverses an import ban imposed by the International Trade Commission

By Melvin Backman·2 min read·Updated December 27, 2023
Add QZ to Google

A US appellate court has temporarily reversed a ban on US imports of the Apple $AAPL Watch Ultra 2 and Apple Watch Series 9 models. It’s the latest chapter in a years-long patent dispute between Apple and a medical device company called Masimo.


Masimo sued Apple in 2020 for stealing the technology that higher-end Apple Watches use for their blood oxygen monitor features, arguing that it was too similar to the light-based pulse oximeter used in a similar piece of Masimo hardware. That suit ended in a mistrial, but a parallel appeal to the US International Trade Commission (ITC) got Masimo the outcome it wanted. The ITC imposed the import ban, which makes it difficult to sell the watches in America because they are manufactured overseas.

After the ruling was handed down in October, the Biden administration declined to veto it by a Christmas deadline. Apple then filed an appeal, with the court today (Dec. 27) issuing a temporary stay on the ITC’s ban. Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding the ruling.

Another wrinkle

Amidst the courtroom volleyball, Bloomberg surfaced a 2013 email from one of the key engineers on the original Apple Watch, Marcelo Lamego. He had been working at a Masimo and its sister company for a decade when Apple began meeting with Masimo during the Apple Watch’s development.

“I have developed several medical devices in last 10 years and I am positively sure I could add a significant value to the Apple team,” the Bloomberg copy of the email reads.

Lamego left Masimo that year for a job at Apple, though he would also end up leaving Apple the next year. The Apple Watch would debut in 2015. Masimo wasn’t formally part of its development, and the unfruitful meetings would spur its 2020 lawsuit.

Related stories

From 2015: 24 hours with the Apple Watch: There is a strange but wonderful computer from the future wrapped around my wrist

The Apple Watch is the most anxiety-inducing device I’ve ever owned

Should you buy an Apple Watch? Well, that depends

Daily Brief

The essential business news, delivered fresh every morning.

Join 500,000+ readers who start their day with Quartz.

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Related

PharmaBristol Myers Squibb is deploying NVIDIA's most powerful AI computing system to speed drug discovery
Money & MarketsOil spikes as Trump says Iran will pay "many times over" for killing three US soldiers
RetailE.U. hits AliExpress with a record €550 million fine for allowing illegal product sales
MarketsJersey Mike's is kicking off its IPO roadshow, targeting up to $1.09 billion
A.I.Head of U.S. federal AI testing institute resigned after just three months