The compensation, set and approved in 2018 by shareholders, rewards based on Tesla’s market value and operational milestones.
But a Delaware judge voided it in January, and Tesla has since then sought to move its state of incorporation to Texas.
The company said in its Monday filing that shareholder recommendation by ISS is based on a “technical misunderstanding” and that the advisory firm recognized the company’s strong performance under Musk.
In an attempt to justify the pay package, Tesla has argued that issuing a new deal for Musk to head the company would actually cost shareholders much more than the current deal. In its latest filings, Tesla said that “a deal should be a deal,” and argued that as Musk had “delivered on his end of the bargain,” then it was time for the EV maker to deliver on its promises.