A “grammar vigilante” sneaks around at night fixing an infuriatingly common error on public signs

Another grammarian who favors a big stick.
Another grammarian who favors a big stick.
Image: AP Photo/Jason Hirschfeld
We may earn a commission from links on this page.

In the world of grammar sticklery, there’s no rest for the weary.

A video published today by the BBC shows an anonymous “grammar vigilante” roaming the streets of Bristol, in the UK, adding apostrophes where they’re missing and covering unnecessary ones. He’s been moonlighting for 13 years, according to the story, and carries a long stick—the “Apostrophiser”—to help him reach improperly punctuated signs. The stealthy stickler does what every English grammar defender wishes they could.

In the video, the incognito copyeditor (whose face is blurred out) changes “gentlemens outfitters” to the correct ”gentlemen’s outfitters,” and tweaks “motor’s” to ”motors” with a strategically placed sticker.

In English apostrophes are used as shorthand for possession. But there are aspects of their use that are indeed genuinely confusing, as in the common exchange of “it’s”—a contraction of “it is” or “it has”—for “its,” the possessive form.

Then there’s the case of a singular noun that ends in “s.” Some style guides, including the Associated Press, simply add an apostrophe, while others (including Quartz) opt for adding the apostrophe as well as an “s”—”the princess’s return.”

It’s perhaps unsurprising then that ad writers and sign-makers tend to omit or misplace apostrophes. But for grammar sticklers like Bristol’s night vigilante, improperly punctuated signs create a kind of visual itch.

But who cares? Someone who passes by a sign that says “Amys Nail’s” knows that this establishment is run by someone named Amy, and you can get your nails done there.

Perhaps it’s because we spend our childhood drilling on grammar rules, so it pains us to see those rules flouted. “All of grammar and grammar snobbery seem to me rooted somewhat in this very fundamental desire to label things right or wrong,” explained grammar columnist June Casagrande when Quartz interviewed her for an earlier story about the Oxford comma.

Which is perhaps why watching the grammar vigilante is so oddly satisfying. He does what we can’t: reach out and carefully, quietly erase the ugly error.