Quartz
Subscribe
Quartz
Subscribe
Edition
Business News
A.I.
Technology
Money & Markets
Leadership
Lifestyle
Latest

Get Quartz in your inbox

Free daily briefing on global business news.

Business News
AirlinesAutomobilesFoodPharmaceuticalsPolitics & GovernmentRetail & EcommerceSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Technology
A.I.ComputingConsumer TechSpace & AerospaceEarnings
Money & Markets
Economic IndicatorsMarketsPersonal FinanceEarnings
Lifestyle
Cars & BikesCollectingEntertainmentFood & Fine DiningHealth and FitnessReal EstateTravel
Quartz

Global business news for a smarter world

Topics

  • Business News
  • Money & Markets
  • Tech & Innovation
  • Generation A.I.
  • Lifestyle
  • Leadership

Products

  • Daily Brief
  • Weekly Digest
  • Member Benefits
  • Quartz Pro

Legal

  • Sitemap
  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Advertising

© 2026 Quartz Media, Inc. All rights reserved.

Business News

Starbucks has to pay California driver $50 million over hot tea spill

The verdict marks one of the largest personal injury settlements against a major chain in recent years

By Francisco Velasquez·2 min read·Updated March 17, 2025
Add QZ to Google

Starbucks $SBUX has been ordered to pay $50 million to a California delivery driver who suffered severe burns when a hot drink spilled onto his lap at a Los Angeles drive-through in Feb. 2020.

A jury found Starbucks (SBUX) responsible for the incident, which left Michael Garcia with permanent disfigurement and required multiple skin grafts and other medical procedures. Garcia’s legal team argued that an employee had failed to properly secure the lid of hot tea beverage in the takeout tray, causing it to spill immediately after the driver collected his order.

Garcia’s lawsuit accused Starbucks of negligence, claiming that the company’s lack of attention to safety standards resulted in life-altering injuries and emotional distress.

While Starbucks expressed sympathy for Garcia, the company disagreed with the jury’s decision and plans to appeal the ruling, arguing that the damages were excessive. Starbucks did not immediately respond to Quartz’s request for comment.

The verdict, handed down by a Los Angeles County jury on Friday, March 14, marks one of the largest personal injury settlements involving a major coffee chain in recent years.

This case also draws parallels to other lawsuits involving fast-food chains, including the infamous 1990s McDonald’s case, in which a woman was awarded less than $600,000 in damages after suffering burns from hot coffee. The recent ruling highlights the ongoing concerns over consumer safety at major foodservice chains.

The financial hit comes at a critical time for Starbucks. The company has suffered four consecutive quarters of lagging sales, prompting new CEO Brian Niccol to announce a plan to restore the company’s dominance in the coffee industry.

The “Back to Starbucks” strategy will see the chain redesign its stores with expanded seating, power outlets, and comfortable lounge areas. It will also reintroduce condiment bars and handwritten names on cups — although the latter has caused some chaos.

Starbucks is also promising faster service, with baristas brewing fresh coffee in under four minutes. The company has reduced its menu by 30% and added new vegan-friendly options. It also removed the extra charge for dairy-free drinks.

Earlier this month, Starbucks revealed it would eliminate 13 drinks from its menu to make room for better-selling options.


Daily Brief

The essential business news, delivered fresh every morning.

Join 500,000+ readers who start their day with Quartz.

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Related

PharmaBristol Myers Squibb is deploying NVIDIA's most powerful AI computing system to speed drug discovery
Money & MarketsOil spikes as Trump says Iran will pay "many times over" for killing three US soldiers
RetailE.U. hits AliExpress with a record €550 million fine for allowing illegal product sales
MarketsJersey Mike's is kicking off its IPO roadshow, targeting up to $1.09 billion
A.I.Head of U.S. federal AI testing institute resigned after just three months